Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
All people should defence by the government. The prompt claims that laws should take into account various conditions such as time and places. I strongly disagree with this statement for two reansons, which I will explain below.
To begin, laws that are flexible in many aspects do not represent rules, which can defence people's rights. Because, when laws has additions and do not straitghforward, then crimes occur. To clarify, the Belarus that had new list of rules and regulations after separation from the USSR in 1991, took into account various circumstances in law for the citizins. According to statistics of the Belarus Minystry of Data, the number of crimes and bias between people increased by 20% after new list of rules. Therefore, law must be as straitgh as possible in order to mitigate curcumventness.
Secondly, if list of laws contain a lot of information then employee who work in courts and defends our rights can make mistakes which lead to unpredictable effect on people's life. To give an example, data gathered by Oxford scientists in 1948 conclude that, after World War 2 number of mistakes in courts increased substantially because of worldwide change in constitution. Consequently, employees of courts need time for absorbing all changes in list of rules because even small mistake can ruin someone's life.
Of course, some may argue that constitution should account various circumstances, but people who want to circumvent such laws will find a lot of holes in this list in order to commit crime. If government will not have straitgh list of law then bias and mistakes in courts will happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
All people should defence by the governm...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reansons, which I will explain below. To begin, laws that are flexible in many...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in order to mitigate curcumventness. Secondly, if list of laws contain a lot ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...small mistake can ruin someones life. Of course, some may argue that constitut...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 19.5258426966 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 2235.4752809 60% => OK
No of words: 267.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06367041199 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84331584695 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580524344569 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 704.065955056 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.809699091 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230526575104 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084846207462 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932558009644 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145183177256 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756692950232 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.