In the modern time, the importance of the education is increasing, while the university education enable students to have a promising future, whether those students who are admitted by the university yet cannot pay their tuition should be given free education by the government has become a question. From my perspective, the government should not offer the free access to universities for poor students. Meanwhile, those unpoverished students should receive some help from the government.
First, It is not realistic for the government to offer the free university education to all the students who cannot afford their tuition. There are considerable of other things should be prior to helpping the poor students such as the basic facilities, constructing public transportations and establishing public medicares which all need fundings from the government. For the gonvernment, the public's basic demanding should be considered first than the demand of individuals. It is not reasonble to ignore the basic need of the works who live in fairly low material living condition and turn to use great amount of government budget to help poor student to continue their education.
Second, the goverment do have the obligation to help student who cannot afford their tuitions since the the right of being equally educated are essential part to the social contract between the government and the public. If students meet the requirement of universities but lack of tuitions, the government should help. In effect, the funding for unpoverished students are common in countries all over the world. In China, for instance, there are scholarships and profit-free loans for students who cannot afford their tuition. Additionally, the admission of universities usually would provide poor students with part-time jobs, and wages could be used as the dailly expense. The government should view helpping the poor student as one of their social commitments and there are plenty of precedents in the world.
Finally, if the government do offer the free education to all the students who cannot pay their tuition, it could be unfair to the student who paid the tuition by their own effort. To make things worse, the easy access could intrigue more poor students to enter the university causing the government budget for their education to increase, and a doom circle is formed.
To sum up, the government should not offer the free university education since there are more public demand should be taken into account first. The government should, however, offer helps like the scholarship or the profit-free loans to the student who cannot afford their tuition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... who cannot afford their tuitions since the the right of being equally educated are ess...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... who cannot afford their tuitions since the the right of being equally educated are ess...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o cannot afford their tuitions since the the right of being equally educated are ...
^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put between 'would' and 'provide'.
Suggestion: would usually provide
...tionally, the admission of universities usually would provide poor students with part-time jobs, and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, while, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 35.0 12.9106741573 271% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32541567696 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83502607442 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437054631829 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0141729481 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.882352941 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7647058824 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354286628376 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15511961835 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968032775045 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258842986234 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371382429686 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.