Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research is basically the use of systematic approach in a particular course of study; it entails conducting experiment on different forms of samples and drawing conclusion based on the results gotten from this study. Scientific research has brought about various developments in different fields over the past centuries. However, it has also brought about disastrous innovation detrimental to the well-being of human being at large. In my opinion, I mostly disagree that the government should place some restrictions on scientific research and development for three reasons.
First, scientific research has been responsible for the discoveries of cure or a prevention mechanism for major life threatening diseases or infections. For example, the recent corona virus pandemic that, claimed a large number of lives. the invention of the vaccine was through scientific research, this development has brought about the order in which the pandemic has disrupted over the world. Another example is the production of drugs for infections such as malaria which has been a major health concern in West Africa. All these developments were brought about through the continuity of scientific research. Any governmental restriction on these research studies would hamper such major development in the history of mankind.
Second, technological development has been brought about by consistent scientific research studies. Technological advancement such as the innovation of computers, mobile phone, and electric vehicle has been made possible through these researches. Incessant scientific research has encouraged the improvement of these inventions over the years. These scientific developments has been of great use in our everyday lives, as they are well incorporated in our homes, place of work; everybody makes calls using the mobile phone, and goes to work using vehicles. If there had been any form of restrictions from the government on the scientific research studies of these inventions, then it would be impossible to benefit from these developments in our day to day activities.
However, some scientific research has produced disastrous innovations. For example, the invention of biological toxins or viruses which are detrimental to the lives of human being. Another example is the innovation of nuclear atoms and bomb. All these, have been used to only cause harm on the lives of living things at large, and thereby cause significant damage to the human population. Government restriction on such scientific research is however necessary, as these would preclude the harms brought about by such developments.
In conclusion, though most scientific developments from research studies have been proven useful and of great importance, some of these developments are on the other hand pernicious to human being. Therefore, the government should place restriction of scientific research that would produce a development detriment to its people, and not on those of significant use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ent corona virus pandemic that, claimed a large number of lives. the invention of the vaccine was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... that, claimed a large number of lives. the invention of the vaccine was through sc...
^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...he years. These scientific developments has been of great use in our everyday lives...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2544.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62831858407 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06633975644 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475663716814 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 774.9 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.918090927 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.636363636 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.90909090909 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233637573133 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855900418464 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065210610057 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155210082539 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425428437029 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.