Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The area of science is a very large one that has helped the world to achieve the ‘unthinkable”. From the iPhone 1 to iPhone 13. From edge to 5G and so on. The prompt suggests that government should place few restrictions on scientific research and development. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the author and suggest that there should be few restrictions on scientific research and development for the following two reasons.
First of all, restrictions on scientific research and development would ensure that researchers do not engage in deleterious research or research that can have a negative impact on the society. If there are restrictions on scientific research and development, researchers would be involved in studies that are in line with moral ethics and values. For instance, if there are no restrictions on scientific research and development, scientists can decide to create robots for war which will have a negative impact on the society. Also, scientists can decide to use harmful materials in products that will have negative effect on the body in the long run. Any action or process that does not have a boundary can definitely result to different unforeseen situations. Hence, restrictions are necessary for proper monitoring of scientific processes to ensure they are in line with moral values.
Second, restrictions on scientific research will help research industries know what areas to focus on and this will help in improving research output in the long run. Knowing what areas to focus on, more resources will be directed towards that particular area. For instance, a research group on malaria drugs when given restrictions or boundaries will help give the group a defined area of research and hence improve the quality of research in that area.
Of course, some argue that restrictions on scientific research will limit researchers and their findings. I concede to this argument, however, do we know what the researchers are up to? What if they are making research on destructive products? Those who say that there should not be restrictions do so at their own peril. Any action or process that does not have a boundary can definitely result to different unforeseen situations. Hence, restrictions are necessary for proper monitoring of scientific processes to ensure they are in line with moral values.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...ed the world to achieve the ‘unthinkable”. From the iPhone 1 to iPhone 13. From e...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, as to, for instance, of course, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19788918206 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00798500128 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.422163588391 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 601.2 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6317908544 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.95 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213503283084 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747264036576 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716457293195 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14706762633 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515942198592 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.