Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Throughout history, scientific research and development played an important role in the evolution of our human civilization. However, some governments still put a lot of restrictions in front of them. Based on this fact, the prompt recommends that these governments should remove any barriers that restrict the progress of scientific research and development. In my opinion, i strongly agree with the suggestion and argue that all governments should take full advantage of scientific research and development by getting rid of any restrictions for the next three reasons that show their benefits of them.
Firstly, the scientific research and development boosted the global economy in the last decades by contributing in the huge increase in the production that lead to availability of goods with cheaper prices than before. For instance, without the scientific research, we wouldn't have artificial intelligence that is implemented in many of machines and robots that make them more productive than the humans in factories. Also, the scientific research and development were the corner stone in the evolution of genetics science that inspired the humans to alter the genes of the plants in order to produce more fruits than ever. Therefore, if the the governments back then didn't decide to support the scientific research, the humans would struggle by now, with limited resources that can cause a collapse in the global economy.
Secondly, The scientific research in the medical sector increased the ability of humans to tackle any new pandemic or epidemic that can put the world population in the risk of extinction. For example, lately, the scientific community has saved the humans from the recent corona virus (covid-19) that strike the world and lead to death of many people, by developing and testing many effective vaccines in short time. Thus, without a proper support for scientific research and development by many of governments around world, the human race would face more loss of souls may be extinction.
Finally, scientific research is the human's last chance to survive in the future. Nowadays, the world faces a lot of severe natural disasters which are the consequences of environmental and climatic changes. These changes may lead our earth planet to be no more suitable for humans to live in. So the government's support for the current scientific space research, which aims to explore the other planets in order to find suitable habitat for the humans in the future, become crucial. Hence, if the governments put any type of restrictions in scientific research of space field, then the human race will lose the hope for surviving in the future.
Of course, some may argue that government should put limitations on funding scientific research and redirect them to more useful areas. if we do that, the human race will lose the chance to survive and develop in the present or future. Accordingly, freeing scientific research and development from restrictions, is a matter of life or death.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sons that show their benefits of them. Firstly, the scientific research and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ce, without the scientific research, we wouldnt have artificial intelligence that is im...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ce more fruits than ever. Therefore, if the the governments back then didnt decide to s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ce more fruits than ever. Therefore, if the the governments back then didnt decide to s...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...efore, if the the governments back then didnt decide to support the scientific resear...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ause a collapse in the global economy. Secondly, The scientific research in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more loss of souls may be extinction. Finally, scientific research is the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the hope for surviving in the future. Of course, some may argue that gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...and redirect them to more useful areas. if we do that, the human race will lose th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in fact, in short, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2541.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8515473244 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4111125446 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.736842105 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4736842105 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3157894737 5.21951772744 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259284963912 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930201356176 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507144199676 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164262102967 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584573891166 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.