Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I feel that government should place few restrictions only in some fields of science and research especially in the fields of defence , gene technology and nuclear physics and it should not place any restrictions in any other fields of math and science. Fields mentioned above have the power of causing a great threat to humanity. On the contrary, several fields like renewable energy, space technology have the potential to save our planet and even provide an alternate habitat for our species.
Say for example, Safety is such a paramount aspect in the field of gene technology and virology, if the labs are not handled at high level safety standards, there will be a risk of a viral outbreak causing a pandemic like the corona virus. Also fields like nuclear physics should be restricted and monitored upon, though it can be used for a good cause like a clean nuclear energy for electricity, however there is always a risk of creating weapons of mass destruction.
On the other hand, I feel in fields like solar energy/wind energy, should not make any restrictions, as improvement in the efficiency of solar cells and wind turbines is what we require currently in the times of highest pollution levels. In fact if possible, more subsidies and fundings should be provided by government for such research areas.
Similarly, space technology should be completely open without any restrictions as advancements in space technology can provide us the opportunity of inter planet travel , which in the worst case scenario, if something happens to the earth, is our only option for survival.
To conclude, I feel that restrictions should only be on specific fields which can pose a huge threat to the survival of humans if not monitored properly, and other fields should be completely free without any restrictions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arch especially in the fields of defence , gene technology and nuclear physics and...
^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...using a pandemic like the corona virus. Also fields like nuclear physics should be r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
... what we require currently in the times of highest pollution levels. In fact if possible, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s the opportunity of inter planet travel , which in the worst case scenario, if so...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, similarly, so, for example, i feel, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83303641817 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6443260379 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.888888889 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.3333333333 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8888888889 5.21951772744 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134777546429 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631493673408 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508059190801 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842853400266 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022488723447 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 48.8420337079 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.