Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
According to the given prompt - ruling governments should tend to have some form of control over the scientific research and developments in their respective nations. I partially agree with the given issue and following are the reasons for my inclination towards the issue.
To begin with, a new science research could be the greatest asset or the most lethal weapon for human kind. Let's take in example of the discovery of atomic energy - the potentially greatest source of energy resulted in development of the destructive atomic bombs know to us, ever. This is one strong evidence as to why the governments must have some form of regulations on developments. While it is important for us to investigate further into the depths of science, we also have to ensure that these depths shouldn't lead us towards our own end.
The second reason, scientific research in many records have tend to differ from morality or have turned into a dangerous experiment. To support this, the ban on further developments of human cloning is the most pertinent example. While human cloning supporters claim that they were a mere result of scientific lab products, they forgot to note the point that they still had a form of life in them. 'Generating' human clones after digesting the fact that they would have lives and those lives would be short lived because of their genetic conditions made enough reason for governments around the world to stop this research any further. By regulating many such research, the governments could ensure that no life or property is hurt in the name of science.
Even after the aforementioned two very strong reasons, the purpose I have mentioned 'partially agree' in the start of the essay is - science should be regulated by government to support humanity but not forced to be used against humanity. A government is nothing but an organization, and sadly not every time they would have the best interest of humankind as their priority. Many countries have special attention to development of weapons as their prime interest to attain more power across borders.
The next cause of partially agreeing with regulations could be easily explained with the buttress of Renaissance period in Europe. Too much interference from ruling kingdoms and the hold of orthodox society made it nearly impossible for scientific liberation in those periods.
Scientific research and development is not a simple black and white topic but comes with its own shades of grey. The governments should have hold on it but still allow the liberty needed to explore. In the end it all sums up to the point that, how the development is supposed to be used and in what aspects it should be regulated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... the most lethal weapon for human kind. Lets take in example of the discovery of ato...
^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'potentially the greatest'.
Suggestion: potentially the greatest
...of the discovery of atomic energy - the potentially greatest source of energy resulted in developmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 509, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...e also have to ensure that these depths shouldnt lead us towards our own end. The se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...cientific research in many records have tend to differ from morality or have turned ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, while, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2251.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00222222222 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72864470075 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528888888889 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5235132319 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.473684211 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6842105263 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179277785303 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596503048226 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325736537642 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105509787142 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365368215724 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.