Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
There is no doubt that scientific discoveries play a huge role in development of a nation. The significant part that helps in determining the growth of a country is played by it's investments in research
Thus restricting it by placing many stringent rules may cause detrimental effects. This aspect will be delineated in the following paragraphs.
Science has always made man wonder and dared him to dream the impossible. It has confounded him, dazzled him or even disappointed him but the relationship between human race and men have always been continuous and progressive. Science has helped us cure some of the most debilitating diseases of the past , given us wings to fly, made us self-sufficient in agriculture terms and revolutionized the field of medicine.
Consider the example of the doctor who discovered the cause of ulcer by drinking the bacterial culture of Pylori. He did it out of sheer love and passion of the subject which ultimately benefitted millions of people. Had the government during his time made a law prohibiting it, we might not have known the cause. Another famous example would be discovery of vaccines. Edward Jenner tested the first vaccine on a child without knowing the result of it. Had he been restrained from doing that due to some legal reasons, the recent ebola or swine flu outbreak would have wiped of the entire population due to lack of knowledge about vaccines.
This is the scenario in the contemporary world too. Thousands of scientists are testing their ideas on animals and humans so that they can produce results that is for the greater good. Scientists are people who should spend enormous amount of time thinking originally or 'Out of the box' to come up with an idea that has never tested before. Placing constraints on their thought process by limiting their options and choices will only hamper it. Consider, what would have happened if Wright brothers were not allowed to use some specific parts of the engine of the plane because of some governmental procedure. We would have never been able to fly! People only dare to dream if they have nothing to stop them.
While it is true that government is responsible for every activity that takes place under it's presidency, if it tries to control or micromanage every single aspect ,it will ultimately lead to chaos and lack progress. It is human tendency to be frustrated and get distressed if our options are limited.
There are millions of diseases that are still incurable. Something like common cold does not have a solution yet. While being optimistic about the future of such discoveries, scientists should be provided with a platform to perform their work with independence and be given the benefit of the doubt.
Having said that, one should not forgot that scientists are also humans and they are subjected to the element of error. Especially in research studies or clinical trials involving humans, the amount of precautions taken should be enormous. Blindly approving an idea is not a sign of good governance. Thus the government should do proper analysis of which area requires careful scrutiny and make laws and ensure that the science field follows it and remove the superfluous ones that may cause more harm than good. Finally, history has shown us that a nation that has learnt the art embracing and supporting science has always progressed and the lives of people were happier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ules may cause detrimental effects. This aspect will be delineated in the followi...
^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...progressive. Science has helped us cure some of the most debilitating diseases of the past ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 305, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e most debilitating diseases of the past , given us wings to fly, made us self-suf...
^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ntrol or micromanage every single aspect ,it will ultimately lead to chaos and lac...
^^
Line 10, column 34, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'forget'
Suggestion: forget
...bt. Having said that, one should not forgot that scientists are also humans and the...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... idea is not a sign of good governance. Thus the government should do proper analysi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, still, thus, while, no doubt, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2837.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 570.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97719298246 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88617158649 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71902910435 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559649122807 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 882.9 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6747579795 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.321428571 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.83258426966 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0861174433897 0.243740707755 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01850707816 0.0831039109588 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249532010859 0.0758088955206 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0398458837977 0.150359130593 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214416979553 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 150.0 100.480337079 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.