Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.

Research and development is considered to be of paramount importance by every nation. The governments allocate a certain amount of funds specifically for the purpose of research and development because they believe that advancements in research is beneficial for the progress of a country. Placing restrictions in the field of research and development is crucial because it defines the boundaries one cannot surpass. I agree that governments should place a few restrictions on scientific research and development.

Firstly, scientific research could be deleterious to living beings or animals and if no actions are taken regarding this, the effects of this research could be detrimental to mankind. For instance, tremendous research is being carried out in the field of nuclear fusion. Debates about nuclear fusion by-products being the potential substitute for non-renewable energy sources is a common topic of contention in nuclear physics. While this research could come up with a salutary solution and reduce the usage of non-renewable resources, the nuclear fusion experiments release chemical substances like deuterium which can't be released in open environments. Hence, the government has placed restrictions that any discharge of products from nuclear experiments must be buried deep inside the ground.

We are familiar with the testing of drugs on animals before a pharmaceutical drug is released into the market. This testing is done on mice and this could have a drastic impact on the population of mice. These mice are used in clinical trials and this could lead to a potential decrease in it's population. It is necessary to circumscribe certain trials on mice or find alternatives to test the product on. Mice aren't the only victims and the population of frog is at a risk too. In biological labs, many people tend to perform dissection on the body of frogs to study the anatomy and this has endangered frogs. Recently, the government enforced many rules that forbid the use of frogs for dissection.

Additionally, the clinical trials or testing on mammals like dolphins have been banned by the governments. A few years ago, the testing of cosmetics happened on dolphins and many other animals like pigs. The governments took notice of this and have enforced strict rules of non-animal testing in many fields of research. Now, one might come across a lipstick and read it's cover which specifies that no testing has been carried out on live animals.

While research is of cardinal importance to the progress of a country, no restrictions need to be imposed unless it is predicted to cause detrimental effects to humanity or animals. Laws in the field of research should be flexible so that one can place restrictions easily when the need arises. Providing total freedom in the field of research and development is not healthy.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hemical substances like deuterium which cant be released in open environments. Hence...
^^^^
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ternatives to test the product on. Mice arent the only victims and the population of ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, while, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 58.6224719101 128% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2393.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22489082969 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98485032106 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491266375546 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6182839439 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.043478261 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9130434783 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.65217391304 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263406145177 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089492301065 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163321349496 0.0758088955206 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162570217982 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.143473671903 0.0667264976115 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.