The interdependence between the society and it's compatriots is a symbiotic relationship, that is the existence of the society is meaningless without it's citizens and vice versa. Existence of people in a society doesn't suffice but their involvement in the activities aiming at the well-being of the society matters. The claim presented above is credible to a certain extent.
Firstly, it is very important that an individual doesn't condone the wrongdoings of the society and must question it's authority. Silently watching the evils manifested in a society is tantamount to an ignorant citizen. For example, in India, everyone habitually complain that the roads aren't kept clean and garbage is ubiquitous. When people talk about issues to each other, the problem is never going to disappear. When the same people question the municipalities responsible for the garbage collection, necessary actions can be taken to ameliorate the situation.
Secondly, the authority working for the welfare of the society might be the people we cast our votes for. Indirectly, this means that we have brought them to power. Hence, instead of questioning the authority, we must also be cognizant of the candidates we vote for. After voting for the wrong candidate, if people question the authority for doing a mediocre job, the citizens are the ones to be blamed and not the authority.
Thirdly, an individual's voice might seem petty in front of the society. Will the voices of a myriad number of individuals be heard? To be certain that when we question the authority, the society takes that into consideration, the means of communicating the problems matters. Social media platforms, news channels, blogs can reach out to masses in a few milliseconds and when the issue is communicated to the masses, the society has no other go but to look into the problems and work for the well-being of the society.
Although, there might be a few critics who assert that in this world of corruption, no matter how many people question it's authority, the society will never look into the problems and find a solution. This might be credible to a certain extent but generalizing this would be wrong. Weighing the pros and cons, it can be concluded that the well being of a society is enhanced when many of it's people question authority.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...versa. Existence of people in a society doesnt suffice but their involvement in the ac...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...it is very important that an individual doesnt condone the wrongdoings of the society ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...yone habitually complain that the roads arent kept clean and garbage is ubiquitous. W...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a few milliseconds and when the issue is communicated to the masses, the society ...
^^
Line 9, column 420, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... many of its people question authority.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 383.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04960835509 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90627146728 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485639686684 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3817174329 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.789473684 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1578947368 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21052631579 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531951921396 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159613824371 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161523854776 0.0758088955206 213% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299976651343 0.150359130593 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127329870725 0.0667264976115 191% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.