The assertion that a society should make efforts to save endangered species only if human activities is the cause behind the extinction, is certainly debatable. While some might argue that, when the cause for extinction includes human activities, efforts must be taken to save such species at a risk of extinction, I disagree with this assertion.
First of all, the flora and fauna of a nation are indeed indicative of the biological wealth of a nation. Preserving fauna, which represent the animals living in an environment is of crucial importance. Indeed, utmost care needs to be taken to save endangered species, regardless of the reasons behind their extinctions. Having a biased opinion to save a species based on a deciding factor like human intrusion is not a viable option, and this could potentially cause an imbalance in the biological ecosystem.
An astounding example is the situation of polar bears, which are on the verge of extinction due to global warming conditions prevalent since a decade. According to the claim mentioned above, no efforts are needed to save the polar bears because the potential extinction of these species is not a result of human activities. Would a society not take any necessary efforts to save a endangered species solely based on the fact that humans had nothing to do with the extinction? In fact, if one carefully analyses the situation, global warming is a result of the pernicious actions taken by mankind like deforestation, pollution and many other factors. Whether or not humans have a role to play in the extinction of a species, it is of paramount importance to take actions to save these endangered species.
Additionally, mankind may not realize the importance of a balance brought about by each and every organism. If the society doesn't take this situation seriously, one might witness a huge chaos in the near future where every organism is competing for the natural resources like food, water and shelter. For example, the decline in the sea otter population saw an increase in the sea urchin population which indirectly increased the pressure on the kelp forests, a primary source of food for the urchins. Despite the fact that man wasn't involved in this entire process, one can't sit back and watch an imbalance in an ecosystem. Actions must be taken to curtail the risks on these endangered species. If no actions are taken, it won't take long for the society to realize that an endangered species is extinct today.
Hence, the society should not be biased in deciding when efforts must be taken to save the fauna and, must take stringent actions to save endangered species, irrespective of the cause of the extinction. The reasons could range from global warming to human activities, deforestation to encroachment contribute to putting many species at the risk of extinction. The cause behind extinction doesn't matter but efforts must be taken to save these endangered species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... not take any necessary efforts to save a endangered species solely based on the ...
^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
...tion, pollution and many other factors. Whether or not humans have a role to play in the extin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...each and every organism. If the society doesnt take this situation seriously, one migh...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 529, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... the urchins. Despite the fact that man wasnt involved in this entire process, one ca...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 572, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt involved in this entire process, one cant sit back and watch an imbalance in an e...
^^^^
Line 9, column 389, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...extinction. The cause behind extinction doesnt matter but efforts must be taken to sav...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 12.9106741573 217% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2464.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05954825462 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81556723322 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455852156057 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1023293251 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.2 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.35 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284684817212 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954144337166 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789926536609 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179345643199 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646845479965 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.