Amongst the two opposing positions stated, I choose to believe in the statement that the government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to everyone. Having said so, arts is a contradictory field. While some may say arts is a field where any amount of pecuniary investment is equivalent to no investment. Many people are not abreast of the cultural aspects of art and this lack of knowledge leads to people losing interest in the field of arts.
Firstly, receiving monetary aid from the government plays a crucial role. Elaborating on the point, taking the current scenario, arts is obscure to a majority of the population. These philistines may probably question the integrity of the arts when they see the government funding. Does government funding violate the integrity? Of course, not. For example, government makes a huge amount of investment in the field of technology which can help us better understand how there is an advancement in technology at a high rate.
Secondly, when the government decides to fund arts, the artists will be encouraged to produce more splendid works to get the attention of people. This implies that the idea of a monetary benefit after many hours of arduous effort will motivate the artists. In addition to government funding, when the former allots a certain amount to the display of arts, it reaches a greater audience and justifies the fact that it will be available to more people. Arts run the gamut, ranging from theatre to paintings, literary arts to street plays.
Is there a direct relationship between the funding and the decline of the integrity of arts?Investing in it consolidates the integrity rather than dividing the integrity. People tend to disregard something when they have a scanty knowledge and this happens to be prevalent in the field of arts. The absence of knowledge is indirectly linked to the scarcity of funding from the government. Also, many firmly believe that when the government acknowledges a field by providing monetary resources, a field is not stagnant anymore and is on the verge of flourishment.
In conclusion, before the field of arts becomes extinct in the eyes of the people, steps need to be taken to shift it from a stage of stalement to a state of progress.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 248, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...said so, arts is a contradictory field. While some may say arts is a field where any ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Investing
...nd the decline of the integrity of arts?Investing in it consolidates the integrity rather...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1917.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 386.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96632124352 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85705256087 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510362694301 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5172025703 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.894736842 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438594722507 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124172432444 0.0831039109588 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0993917497034 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232818750589 0.150359130593 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0963574412859 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.