Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Innovative research and development in the field of Science helps a country to progress towards success. Governments imposing strict restrictions on such scientific projects may not be a good idea. Instead, in my opinion, governments should carefully weigh the advantages against the disadvantages and then decide to place restrictions, if any, on a scientific project.
To begin, the space program of NASA was placed under several restrictions by cutting down funds, after the unfortunate accidents of two space shuttles; Challenger and Colombia. This stagnated the development of research in the prestigious space agency, forcing the agency to depend on Russian developed space capsules to go to the International Space Station and stay active in the field. On the other hand, SpaceX which is an independently funded space agency was able to make the first US space shuttle capsule to send astronauts to the International Space Station. Had the government not imposed financial restrictions on NASA, space capsules would have been developed earlier. Thus, imposing restrictions on research that is advantageous for the country is not a good strategy to witness the country’s growth.
In contrast, some scientific projects could be harmful to the country or even human society. For instance, governments supporting researches that aim to develop weapons of mass destruction such as nuclear weapons or missiles is condemnable activity. This type of research has the potential to cause damage to a large proportion of society by unjust loss of innocent lives. Governments should thus be wary of the goal of a research that can potentially cause more harm than benefits and place strict restrictions on the research to prevent any harm.
The above is also applicable to independent organizations showing the ability to develop such harmful inventions, which rarely seems to occur. Nonetheless, governments should carefully determine the funding of such organizations and take actions to prevent the development of any invention that may be detrimental to human society.
In conclusion, any research that is being conducted at a large or a small scale and is dependent on the government, then the project should be carefully scrutinized to identify the benefits as well as disadvantages to take further action on imposing restrictions. Also, governments should be wary of researches in independent organizations to carefully evaluate and impose restrictions on them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endangered animal or plant species Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statem 58
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 60
- Many important discoveries or creations are accidental it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, nonetheless, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2091.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48818897638 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19887536124 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.514435695538 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 646.2 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.830061064 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.6875 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213109551027 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772352070894 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326151810634 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12690896607 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206780357257 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.