Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The statement says the Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development. Science is one of mankind’s greatest studies that has allowed us to evolve into the beings we are today. From the earliest trial and error of forming the wheel and fire, Einstein’s Theory of Relativity and the multiple trials of creating vaccines to protect us against pathogens, research has allowed us to push the limits of science further and further. But with the many success, there have been numerous egregious consequences that have occurred in the wake of scientific research and that is why if disagree with the sentence above.
First, the creation of restrictions are usually due to mistakes made in past trials that have led to harmful outcomes. An example would be the many laws that are created when testing is to be done on human beings. Test examiners must have participants read sign multiple documents outlining what the experiment is testing, if there are any harmful products that may be exposed to the participants and possible side effects and long-term issues that could arise. The Tuskegee syphilis experiments are an example of why there should be restrictions imposed on scientific research due to the fact that those trials led to the illness and deaths of the participants who were not told they were infected with a disease but not given any sort of help afterward.
Next, a government that imposes restrictions on research allows for safe products to enter the market. Scientific research into medicine to help manage, alleviate or cure diseases is one of the most important activities we as a society can strive for. The concern is the materials to used in medicine, food additives etc. are toxic, steps need to be taken in order to ensure that when it is allowed for public use, the products are vetted. Before companies can test on humans, there are restrictions that say to go through multiple trials using other animals as participants and show with sufficient evidence that there is a low probability of serious side effects on people. The FDA is the organization that creates the rules, restrictions, and regulations for drug companies when in research and development to ensure the public that products are as safe as they can be.
Then, Government restrictions that are created and implemented can deter bad actors from using the research process to create weapons. Scientific research in to the field of nuclear energy has many restrictions due to the instability of the material and the power that it holds if it were to be used as a weapon. A bad actor, if not deterred by the numerous amounts of restrictions set in place, could and would use the ability to harness the power of nuclear energy in their research and use it to create massive destruction.
Considering the idea that if the Government were to have few, if any restrictions on scientific research, some would argue that it would allow for more success in finding products that could further progress society such as researching materials that could cure cancer, Parkinson’s, Dementia and Climate Change to name a few. But if there is no restrictions on research, testers can do anything means necessary to find success which could mean disregard for workers, particapants and the general public. This is why we need to restrictions on scientific research.
When it comes to restrictions on scientific research placed by the government, I disagree with the statement above in that we need them in order to ensure the safety of everyone involved along with the general public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...ience further and further. But with the many success, there have been numerous egreg...
^^^^
Line 1, column 482, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun success seems to be countable; consider using: 'many successes'.
Suggestion: many successes
...ience further and further. But with the many success, there have been numerous egregious con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 334, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no restrictions'?
Suggestion: there are no restrictions
...nd Climate Change to name a few. But if there is no restrictions on research, testers can do anything me...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 489, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...egard for workers, particapants and the general public. This is why we need to restrictions on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 203, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ety of everyone involved along with the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3016.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 600.0 442.535393258 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02666666667 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94923200384 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83547174206 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 928.8 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0847951171 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.619047619 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5714285714 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194882235613 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066602973568 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053289771789 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111378816165 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336896013179 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.