Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Development in the scientific reasearch has helped a human race to advance at such a extent. Curious mind of a human has invented countless things to make lives better, on the other hand to take those lives also. I partially agree with the author’s statement, as there are two sides of coin.
Firstly, scientific advancements has taken us to the moon and soon probably to the mars. This wouldn’nt have happened if we have stopped these scientists from their discoveries. In ancient era, it was considered as a sin to cut up deadbodies but, this didn’t stop some curious minds from discovring the human body parts. Moreover, if there wouldnt have been any development in medcines, people still would have been dying because of dangerous diseases like ChickenPox, Plague, Polio. Scientific researches have become the necessity of the world.
Secondly, same science which helps in curing and betterment of lives can also take those live. Over the centuries, there have been shocking invetsntions in weaponaries. While some may claim that weapons are supposed to defend ourselves, our people but, these lethal ineventions has numerous lives. We all know the “Heroshima-Nagasaki” tragedy, development in nuclear bombs, atom bombs destroyed 2 cities in seconds. People saw how devastating this invention was, then many countries came together to form United Nations and to sign treaty against the use of nuclear power. On the other hands same weapons can be used to defend borders of the countries from enemies.
If Governments put few restrictions on such research, tragedies like heroshima nagasaki can be avoided. However, Government should be very careful about restricting the research areas as it can hamper the potential ideas, discoveries, and inventions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... helped a human race to advance at such a extent. Curious mind of a human has inv...
^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., on the other hand to take those lives also. I partially agree with the author’s st...
^^^^
Line 2, column 340, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...he human body parts. Moreover, if there wouldnt have been any development in medcines, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 281.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3024911032 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01289638233 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.661921708185 0.4932671777 134% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8929731501 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.125 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5625 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189382421215 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558951851268 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773093761038 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113724070136 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100040179564 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.