Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Restrcitctions in various fields of science limit the scope of development but also ensure ethical and kind practices to be followed, these restrictions are necessary to ensure ethical practices and saveguard rights of test subjects, whether be it animals or human subjects. So, it is mandatory to have restricitions to ensure ethics and safeguard subjects and surroundings, the fewer the restricitons the more severe harm these researches can do in the name of devlopment. The following points will help in consolidating my position on the given issuse.
It is necessary to keep in check what the researches do in the name of tests and trials, so proper laws are required by the government so no exploitation is done during these trails and testing phase. For example, when making a new food item to provide more energy it may be tried on animals and human for testing and tasting purposes this may not necesssarily cause any fatal problem but may have an alergic effect on the subject due the new chemicals used in it, which may have repurcussions later on in the life of the individual. So, proper set of rules like the tester taking responsibility for any harm caused should be mandated to prevent exploitation.
In some scientific researches like devlopment of bombs, torpedoes and explosives, if proper restrictions are not placed and monitored by governments. It may to great catastrophes, as history has show us the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagaski in the past where innocent are still suffering due to the previous atomic bombings. This is the clear result of improper restriciton on the scientist and researchers. Even when torpedoes and bombs are tested they cause great pollution to the enviroment a lot of times as it is difficult to contain them in a given space. So, such reseaches whould have strict guidelines set for safety and security purposes.
Though restriciton on resarches in many fields are necessary, In some fields they should be waived of if the they help in growth of humankind in a positive way. Like when developing a cancer cure the number of restriciton placed on scientist can be reduced, giving them freedom to solve a buring issue. In this way they can stretch their arms and work with various otherwise forbidden substances, like cannabis which is currently illegalised for even medicinal pursposes in many parts of the worlds, allowing to use such things may cause some good in some rare cases of cancer cure.
So, one can conclude restrictions on scientific reserach is mandatory in majority of the fields in some cases giving relaxation to restriction can also have positiive effects. So, I agree with the given prompt, though not completely. Fine lines need to be drawn between what is ethical and not and it should be ensured that exploitation is never taking place. The advantage gained by removing such restricitons is not worth the dangers it causes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...some fields they should be waived of if the they help in growth of humankind in a positi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...if the they help in growth of humankind in a positive way. Like when developing a cancer cure the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 510, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...s in many parts of the worlds, allowing to use such things may cause some good in some...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion can also have positiive effects. So, I agree with the given prompt, though no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2424.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99793814433 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9012631887 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513402061856 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4087154647 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.666666667 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9444444444 23.4991977007 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134722594639 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412505779097 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317202728043 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0737027994815 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020774604367 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.