Education is the driving force for individual growth as well as nation building. The way a country educates it's citizens decides the future of country in itself. The given prompt here suggests that, until the students enter college, they should have a common curriculum whatsoever. I completely disagree with the authors argument to enforce a common syllabus across the nation for following reasons.
Firstly, each child is different and they develop individual interest in subjects the learn. Not everyone will like same thing. Consider an example were a child is passionate about playing a guitar. Once he is clear about his motive to be a musician, there should not be any hindrance in his path of being a consummate Guitarist. If a common curriculum is enforced, this child still has to study biology even though it serves no purpose to his interest. Moreover if this student facing difficulties in handling a particular subject which is not even necessary for his growth, it might discourage him about his abilities to pursue music as well. Therefore enforcing a common syllabus makes the life of a passionate individual kid miserable.
Additionally, A nation might constitute of diverse cultural states in it's own. For instance mother tongue of kids in each state might be different. Consider a country like India which is so diverse that there are 10 official languages countrymen speaks.
in situations like this, a nation can not just enforce one language to be studied by every cultural. Attempting to teach all these languages to everyone across the nation is practically impossible. Hence, There should be a provision to learn the language which represents the culture of that state in particular. Ignoring this diverse nature and enforcing a single language would lead to death of many cultures.
Some might argue that, to have the feeling of oneness within the nation a common curriculum is needed. But such enforcement especially while studying a language is more like enforcing one religion or one race that would ultimately lead to the death of other languages and hence such attempts in education should be discouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...soever. I completetly disagree with the authors argument to enforce a common syllabus a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...evelop inidividual interest in subjects the learn. Not everyone will like same thing. Con...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing a guitar. Once he is clear about his motive to be a musician, there should no...
^^
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...h it serves no purpose to his interest. Moreover if this student facing difficulties in ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 648, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... his abilities to pursue music as well. Therefore enforcing a common syllabus makes the l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... official languages countrymen speaks. in situatiojns lihe this, a nation can not...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in particular, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 349.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16332378223 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79156630287 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567335243553 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 580.5 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5572434961 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.45 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178121065302 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543317751544 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402549224017 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102199045573 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480785664787 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.