The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries.
To qualify the arbitrary statement, I believe that whether the impact is instantaneously will affect the judgments of the public futher influence the evaluation of the greatness of individuals.
As the technology rapidly progresses, smartphones, the Internet and artificial intelligence have become the inalienable products in modern society and behaviors of people have been influenced without consciousness. Thus, the greatness of the inventor and the scientists of above revolutionary technology are globally-recognized by contemporaries. For example, most of the electronic devices, such as auto-pilot cars, smarphones, laptops, and wearable devices, are drived and controlled by tiny but critical components called integrated circuits. Compared to understandable discrete circuits, which are composed by eye-scale components, such as battery, resistors, capacitors and inductors, intergrated circuits adopt micrometer-scale transistors, which are made of semiconductors, to fullfill functionalities. It's the technology that enabled the size of transistors can be limited in micrometer and futher limit the size of our electronic devices. The prevalence of such devices are the reflection of greatness of the inventors.
Besides, the contributions to the public health are prominent as well, which not only save millions of people who have suffered from pandemic and endemic, but prevent the rest of the world from being pagued by deadly diseases. For example, Taiwan was regarded as the most vulnerable country affected by the pandemic, COVID-19, at the begining of the outbreak; however, led by the commander of public health expert, the government took the very early stage precautions on limits on surgical facial masks and travel bans to prevent the pandemic from spreading in Taiwan. Until now, the total number of infections of the whole world are more than three hundred thousands, which is still on the exponential rise, but that of Taiwan is merely less than two hundred with no clues that we are under the threat of community infections. Most of Taiwanese are grateful to the commander and the medicine staff who stood in the front line to combat the deadly virus, and even European and the American reporters have appraised the performance of the virus control.
To conclude, I believe the greatness of individuals will be recognized when their impacts has deeply influenced the whole society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 811, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...onductors, to fullfill functionalities. Its the technology that enabled the size of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2051.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 366.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60382513661 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25482320686 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57650273224 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7646449048 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.916666667 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110199489801 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422164159392 0.0831039109588 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050165141158 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782331166166 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566761722234 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.2 14.1392134831 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.38706741573 126% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.8971910112 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.