The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Many people would bolster that the greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. In some sense, the greatness of individuals can indeed be decided after their posthumous because eminency after the death can indicate that the greatness is perpetual not just followed by the trend of contemporaries. Yet, I still believe the greatness of individuals can be decided not only by those who live after them but also by their contemporaries.
Of course, recognizing after the great individuals’ death is indeed capitulating because it implies that the individuals have had the superior skills and still it is renowned until the current society. Also, there are always people who are not very understood by their contemporaries; as time proceeds, their traces become fully understood and gain popularity. Vincent Van Gough is the epitome of the argument - posthumous popularity. He was not well-known as an artist when he was alive, but now everyone in the world has at least heard about the artist and seen the artwork of Vincent Van Gough. Some people would assert that contemporaries society has smattering knowledges to understand the greatness of individuals, which needs to be well construed after their lives.
Nevertheless, it does not necessarily right that greatness can be measured only after the deaths. The greatness should be considered regardless of time frame; if one person has done astonishing progress in one specific field, the person needs to be touted by contemporaries society and by those who lived after. For example, Einstein and Wandy Warhol are the most ineffable heritage of modern society as a scientist and an artist, respectively. These two men were considered highly valuable and extolled during their alive periods with all their progress, and even after their death, we are still well aware of their popularity. Like the example mentioned right above, the greatness of individuals should be considered and measured no matter what time frame people are in.
In addition, in terms of contemporary society, we have enormous great individuals who live the same period as ours. Athletics, soldiers, doctors, and so on; these people or any vocations which are worthies to get praised are already fully aware by the contemporious people. For example, in every Olympics, all people from the world become egregious and give the biggest applaud to athletics. Or doctors who are in the middle of the COVID pandemic are fully well recognized by citizens for their labored work. What is the point if these people are going to be well famous after their death, not at this moment?
To sum up, despite examples of considering the greatness of individuals after their deaths, there are peoples, also, who are well recognized with their greatness currently. Taken together, the greatness of individuals should be considered regardless of the period when the individuals are located.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 629, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'contemporaries'' or 'contemporary's'?
Suggestion: contemporaries'; contemporary's
...an Gough. Some people would assert that contemporaries society has smattering knowledges to un...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'contemporaries'' or 'contemporary's'?
Suggestion: contemporaries'; contemporary's
...field, the person needs to be touted by contemporaries society and by those who lived after. F...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, so, still, well, at least, for example, in addition, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21008403361 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90128724249 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47268907563 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 776.7 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3307644067 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.57064121969 0.243740707755 234% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190422097558 0.0831039109588 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.194074266756 0.0758088955206 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.346281519911 0.150359130593 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19515597517 0.0667264976115 292% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.