The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Is greatness of individual to be decided only by those who live after them or by their contemporaries? I personally think that getting recognized only after death is an issue. Majority would prefer to get cherished
for their greateness during their lives. Unfortunately, this issue was always present throughout the history. For example newton whose work was only recognized after his death. However, modern environement
fortuitously allows us to assess each other's greateness and praise each other. In academic community, the means of evaluation serve conferences where one's work is perusely asessed and presented to the large
audience if it proves to be valuable.
Our legacy has provided us with numeores examples in which a person who would speak widsom, but instead of being cherished they were often rejected from the soiciety or were considered heretic.
For example Newton, a famous researcher in physics everyone today knows about, was severely underrated during his life.
He lived near the poverty line and his work was rotting unnoticed. Only after his death his works were recognized and admited to have been important.
While there were few other scientists who were aware of his talent, his work only got popular attention only after the death. Fortunately, sometimes the contrary can be true.
In today's society, people are aware of the historical facts where people were recognized only after their death. Since majority feels uncomfortable about being discovered only after they've died, these issues
have been adressed. There are ways for people to get known during their lives. For example, in research community there are many ways to get attention of your contemporaries.
In case of newton, there were no (or not strong enough) research associations such as IEEE, IFAC, or AIII that would sure that all the novel work in the respective fields gets attention
and the praise they deserve. So, in today's world we luckily have means of deciding whether someone is great or not. For example, even my recent work in optical character recognition got attention of the public
on the IFAC conference and our work will soon be published.
In summary, while the past showed that there were no laudable means of getting known in the life. Today this issue has been adressed in various ways and we often get recognize for our greateness during our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... his death. However, modern environement fortuitously allows us to assess each ot...
^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...s of evaluation serve conferences where ones work is perusely asessed and presented ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 183, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they've
...table about being discovered only after theyve died, these issues have been adressed....
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 31, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...raries. In case of newton, there were no or not strong enough research associati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16795865633 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62082006147 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547803617571 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0913999579 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9090909091 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77272727273 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.97078651685 282% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295627446873 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963089717805 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157686014913 0.0758088955206 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101470016593 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121410166544 0.0667264976115 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.