The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Recently, a prevalent statement we often see is that an entity only could be estimated by people live after them. This is because those people could have more total comprehension with concerning whole life. Opponents, nonetheless, argue that contemporaries also could provide valuable opinions about the greatness of an entity. From a personal view, both are reasonable. The details would be discussed below.
To begin with, people who live after one specific entity could glean more comprehensive information. Specifically, one would manage to hide some details of his life as living style, income condition, family members and so on. But these information could be achieved easily after his death because few people would keep these secrets for a dead man. In this case, people who live after that entity could access much more information and make a fair opinion about him. At the same time, there is no doubt that a man's death means the end of his own story. He could not do anything to get achievement or treat others. His all work would not go on but stopping and waiting for estimating.
At the same time, however, one specific entity's contemporary people also provide the essential message for their own feeling about him. For instance, few of us could tell clearly how Confucious change farmer's living style. In this condition, assume that we are real farmers who live in that temporary. There is no doubt that we could claim the truth more readily. The people who live in the same earl with a specific entity would spend a life which was influenced by that man in almost all aspects. And these influences could affect people's feeling profoundly. Hence, contemporary people have the ability to detail one's achievement and influence from their own feeling.
Admittedly, a minority of individuals tend to believe that contemporary people who were treated or influenced by the environment could hardly provide opinions without partisanship. Nonetheless, if we could analyze that issue from a different view, we could find they have oversimplified the fact that their partisanship is also a crucial part of researching history. Researcher is necessary to glean comprehensive information to recreate a total figure of a specific individual. Treating is also a part of that figure.
To sum up, it is best to collect estimation not only after one death but also he is alive in order to access an ecumenical figure. Considering the different reasons above, both statements are reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...ondition, family members and so on. But these information could be achieved easily after his deat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 616, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...orary people have the ability to detail ones achievement and influence from their ow...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, nonetheless, so, for instance, no doubt, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 409.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1369193154 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8377029919 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513447432763 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6565182084 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.04 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.36 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12898174728 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397139236621 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369414413767 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799034744521 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311281795871 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.