A machine that can lift a hundred elephants or a computer that can perform trillions of calculations in a fraction of a second need a human being to provide them their purpose.
In the recent past human beings have developed machines that can defeat a chess grandmaster, can model the behavior of a cyclone and predict its motion and many more. Indeed a human being can never surpass their muscle power, but can these machines serve any purpose without human instruction? They cannot. The chess playing machine Deep Blue which defeated Gary Kasparov was trained by other grandmasters and its decision-making ability was specified by some human being. The supercomputers which predict the path of the cyclone may provide convincing data but it is for a human being to take a decision.
The same rise in technology has also been deleterious to people in low skilled jobs, where automation has started to replace them. This concern raises the question, can machines surpass human beings? To which I feel there is no substantive evidence because technological advances have brought new professions into the picture. A student of the early 2000 era who is an android developer, would have never imagined such a job in his college time. Every time something new came into the market, people started to absorb it and started to figure out use cases which the inventors themselves would not have imagined. This clearly supports the fact that the human mind is superior.
There are a few cases that can say otherwise. Recent trends in artificial intelligence present solutions that can surpass human beings in identifying objects and classifying them. Some of these machines have learned to solve problems in ways which were not imagined such as Deep Mind's AlphaGO, which defeated the world champion of GO. It is possible for machines to surpass the human mind in certain fields.
Human beings have developed machines that can help overcome their limitations and solve problems which may not finish within their lifetime, and the immense muscle power possessed by these machines can replace few less skilled jobs, but with persistence and the keenness to learn, human beings can find ways to make machines work for them which is in agreement with the author's view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 168, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...e and predict its motion and many more. Indeed a human being can never surpass their m...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r a human being to take a decision. The same rise in technology has also been d...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, second, so, i feel, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1895.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05333333333 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62296998754 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530666666667 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.0332641341 60.3974514979 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4375 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255459370815 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918462418143 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673328723313 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160530713844 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481920663873 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.