The question of superiority between a human brain and machines has always haunted the minds of thinkers since the emergence of the latter. The statement asserts that the human mind is superior since machines are the tools of the human mind. At this point of human development, I mostly agree with this assertion.
First of all, we cannot argue with the fact that machines are the product of humans’ imagination and intelligence. In order to be created machines need human beings’ both mental and physical abilities. Only once built and programmed, they can function, unlike humans who do not need any external intervention. Nowadays we have extremely intelligent robots who are probably smarter than the majority of us when it comes to mathematical problems or other tasks involving the knowledge of certain facts, smart homes, self-driving cars - but all of them are the products of the human mind. Unless the machines learn how to manufacture each other, how to become intelligent and keep developing without humans’ assistance, the human mind will stay superior.
Secondly, the human mind is not only thinking and analytic capabilities, which can be replicated by machines, but also dreaming and imagination, and some other yet unexplored abilities. Hence, the machines can become superior to us at some subjects, but they are not likely to get a hold of everything that makes a human mind unique. Yes, artificial intelligence is now able to create paintings, make music and other forms of art. However, what does it reflect? What does it represent? Art has always been considered to be a way to express people’s worries, ideas, ideals that is why it has been so useful to historians since it was a reflection of the time it was created in. The creations of AI might be beautiful, flawless, surprising, but they do not hold any real value to humans as a developing civilization. Of course, it has a significant value for the further development of the technology, but nothing more since the art created by AI is simply an aggregation of what was fed into the system. It will always lack the meaningness which only the human mind can express and perceive.
However, there are people who believe that soon humankind can lose its superiority to machines and robots. This point of view that at first might seem untenable, in fact, has its right to exist. In the last couple of decades, robotics, AI, machine learning have been developing with impressive speed and success - replacing some employees, building models instead of experienced analytics and so on. However, despite its skyrocketing development, it will take a much longer time for it to be able to compete with the human mind. The human mind is still an enigma for humans themselves. We do not know fully what it is capable of. Therefore, how can the machines - products of the human mind - know better than its creators? In this battle, humanity is closer to omniscience than anything else.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...decades, robotics, AI, machine learning have been developing with impressive speed a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, in fact, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2482.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00403225806 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87269907926 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510080645161 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 778.5 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9209640111 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.28 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.84 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304024608778 0.243740707755 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949094708095 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808536259651 0.0758088955206 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212018381485 0.150359130593 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464676039972 0.0667264976115 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.