If not for human mind , we would have been still living in the ancient age. Machines are product of human mind, without which machines are inept.This prompt recommends that Machines can never supersede the intellectual level of a human mind. I strongly agree with the statement here and support it for following reasons.
To begin with, As with the advancement of technology and science, Artificial Intelligence and Data science fields has brought next level intelligence in the machines where machine can learn by itself using myriad databases available and can calculate with the speed of light metaphorically.However, This could only become possible due to the designs and algorithms human minds had developed to feed into the machines.Without humans, machines are just a piece of crap.It can be demonstrated with a very simple example that a normal Computer possesses ability to perform various calculations and functionalities but, it can only be possible if a human wants to turn the power on. Similarly, This clearly expains that machines can never undermine human minds.
Further, Machines only functions accurately in a well defined environment, any deviation from the ideal situation would likely to fail the machine's operation.However, with the error handling, machines can perform accurately even in the situation which is not considered as ideal which has become possible because humans created different situations where machines could fail and handled them assiduously that made machines fault-tolerant.Therefore , we can say that machines are merely superficial ,but, the puppets of human minds and can only perform as we want.
Although, with all these enormous development in the machines you cant predict that machines could become smarter in future and surpass the human intellect. But, As of now Human minds are superior to the machines.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
If not for human mind , we would have been still living in the ...
^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
... mind, without which machines are inept.This prompt recommends that Machines can nev...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and support it for following reasons. To begin with, As with the advancement o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... with the speed of light metaphorically.However, This could only become possible due to...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Without
...had developed to feed into the machines.Without humans, machines are just a piece of cr...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 473, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...mans, machines are just a piece of crap.It can be demonstrated with a very simple ...
^^
Line 2, column 694, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n wants to turn the power on. Similarly, This clearly expains that machines can n...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hines can never undermine human minds. Further, Machines only functions accurat...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'machines'' or 'machine's'?
Suggestion: machines'; machine's
...deal situation would likely to fail the machines operation.However, with the error handl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...d likely to fail the machines operation.However, with the error handling, machines can ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ously that made machines fault-tolerant.Therefore , we can say that machines are merely s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t made machines fault-tolerant.Therefore , we can say that machines are merely sup...
^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...say that machines are merely superficial ,but, the puppets of human minds and can ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...minds and can only perform as we want. Although, with all these enormous develo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...normous development in the machines you cant predict that machines could become smar...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, still, therefore, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 289.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44290657439 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24721357897 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 229.290992791 60.3974514979 380% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 196.625 118.986275619 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.125 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 7.80617977528 192% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346881561687 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167600970565 0.0831039109588 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500465334653 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233947168502 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429583994992 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.3 14.1392134831 158% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.8420337079 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.1743820225 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.