Humanity has made little real progress over the past century or so. Technological innovations
have taken place, but the overall condition of humanity is no better. War, violence, and poverty
are still with us. Technology cannot change the condition of humanity
Technological advancements have ascended to the apex, in the piles of achievements of the human race, called Homo Sapiens. But, it is a legitimate and perplexing question that one might have, that have we really achieved something when the over all condition of humanity is worse. A the notion that "Technology cannot change the condition of humanity" might be derived as an answer or plausible answer to that question. I think that Technology can partially help in the amelioration of humanity but only to a certain extent. My views on the issue are expressed in the two paragraphs below.
Technology was never a result of, or meant to serve humanity or for altruistic purposes but rather due to and for imperialism and capitalsim. The directions technological advancements adopts is decided by the imperative forces on it by those in hegemony and funded by those who have the sumptuous means. For example the technological developments that has lead to fighter aircrafts, tanks and the "Fat Boy" atomic bomb all were galvanized and bolstered people in power and people with capital. The technological advancements mentioned earlier have fulfill no humanitarian purposes. This goes to show that most of the technology that are developed are mainly motivated by imperialistic ideoligies and funded by capitalism.
We often don't understand what technological development might be apropos in our daily life. For example, before wheels came into existence people never knew how useful wheels can be, and how it would revolutionize the transportation system around the world. It was after they were discovered the realization dawned on us that how germane they are in our daily life and how it reduces our efforts. This shows that most of us might not even have the conviction to comprehend the relevance of certain scientific developments and how their transformation into technology would underpin our daily lives.
For technology to ameliorate the condition of humanity it needs to be accessible to the every human being on the Earth. Without the technology like medical equipments being avilable to people for example: farmers in rural India, it would not be possible to help them out if they suffer from some fatal disease. These issues of accessibility of technology are generally governed by supply chains and policies by the administration, which are inefficient and flawed or are purposefully desgined. Technology becomes helpless when it is bridled to reach its potential customer. For technology to reach all humans and uplift humanity requires humane decisions and policies that would regulate an efficient dispensation of technology.
In sum, humanity is partially undergirded by technological advancements as people who control it, belong to the imperial or economically affluent section of the society. Thus humanity is not a domineering factor in the conception of new technologies and inturn fail to uplift humanity extensively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'A' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: A; The
...ver all condition of humanity is worse. A the notion that 'Technology cannot cha...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ut rather due to and for imperialism and capitalsim. The directions technological...
^^
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'fulfilled'.
Suggestion: fulfilled
...cal advancements mentioned earlier have fulfill no humanitarian purposes. This goes to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ies and funded by capitalism. We often dont understand what technological developme...
^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ically affluent section of the society. Thus humanity is not a domineering factor in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, so, thus, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36480686695 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19927647515 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534334763948 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 819.0 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3392187141 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.047619048 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1904761905 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.2380952381 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308209813632 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101223697591 0.0831039109588 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749890517059 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185790355729 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809164248869 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.