People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
There always have been a rife between emotion and logic since the primordial times and it doesn't seem to be settled anytime soon. It is a widespread notion that people who make decisions under the influence of emotions are bad decision-makers even if they justify them with logic after. I beg to differ from this opinion. Emotions are what makes a human a human. Logic plays an important part in our quotidian lives and must not be ignored as well. If decisions were not supposed to have an ounce of emotion associated with it, whether expressed or eventually suppressed, we would be no lesser than robots. In my opinion, people who rely on emotions more while taking decisions and later try to appropriate them with logic are better in taking decisions because they bring in the humane aspect in this transaction of decisions. There are two main reasons that I will base my opinion on.
Emotions and logic are not against each other rather they should run parallel while making decisions. For example, if in the midst of a pandemic like the Coronavirus pandemic, a small company is being unable to sustain all its employees with the usual salary the company has limited options. It has been seen that some employers consider the financial crisis that the employees might have to go through if they are laid off on such short notices. The emotional aspects come into play here in making the employer think of the possibilities of how he can mitigate the distress the employees might go through. If the decision had to be completely logical the employer would have found it best to lay off a required fraction of the workforce. Rather, when the emotional and logical reasoning both were at play some employers could manage to take decisions that partially affected the employees but still provided minimal support they could at the same time. This not only did instill a sense of respect and trust in the affected employees but also an efficient way was discovered and implemented.
Emotions help invoke logical reasoning, and to be better decision-makers. The pleasure one derives from the outcomes of a decision taken drives the human being to take further responsible decisions. The sense of leadership or being in command where the situation demands a decision requires certain emotions to invoke it in the first place, It is not possible for the emotion to disappear once the desire to take the decision has been invoked. Thus, if at that moment a decision is taken it will have a conflation of emotions and logic that underpins the decision.
One might argue that basing decisions completely on emotions and not on logic is a trait of a poor decision-maker. It does hold true if emotions are the only support your decision has. Logic as to be present as a buttress to any decision or else the decision is no less than an equivocation.
In sum, it is not entirely true that people who take decisions based on emotions and justify them with logic are bad at making decisions. It is true given that the decisions were made only based on emotions. If not then the above reasons delineate how it doesn't justify one as a poor decision-maker.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...logic since the primordial times and it doesnt seem to be settled anytime soon. It is ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'a human'.
Suggestion: a human
...m this opinion. Emotions are what makes a human a human. Logic plays an important part in our q...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 608, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...istress the employees might go through. If the decision had to be completely logic...
^^
Line 9, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...sions were made only based on emotions. If not then the above reasons delineate ho...
^^
Line 9, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...then the above reasons delineate how it doesnt justify one as a poor decision-maker.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in my opinion, it is true, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2609.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79595588235 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67729804497 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476102941176 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 841.5 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7974869302 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.36 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.76 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518051178696 0.243740707755 213% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165774912878 0.0831039109588 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143266863909 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.36733809528 0.150359130593 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135327285598 0.0667264976115 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.