If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
I oppose the statement given that any means of attaining a goal are justifiable if it is worthy enough. The idea of having absolute freedom to achieve a required desired result is logically flawed and subjective in nature and in the subsequent paragraphs, I explain my stance.
Firstly, how does one define a goal? For some mediocrity might be a goal while others may strive for excellence. How does one know what means are justifiable and what is not to attain it? For instance, consider two persons A and B, having goals X and Y respectively, where X may be equated to excellence whereas let Y be a mediocre goal. Although in the eyes of the B goal Y seems difficult to achieve and might make him take extreme actions to achieve it, person A can perform the task Y easily and would not approve of the actions taken by B. This difference in the definition of goal among different individuals can cause rifts which can be catastrophic for the society.
Furthermore, what is the definition of worthy? Who decides whether some goal or task is worthy enough for a person to carry out, let even achieve it in any manner possible. The notion of the worthiness of a goal varies from person to person and is not even a quantifiable entity. A goal that is worthy for a person X might not be so for another individual. That raises further questions on whether the actions carried out by X were not even necessary in the view of another person Y, as he didn't even consider the goal worth pursuing. This shows the logical flaw present in the given statement and further justifies my opposition to it.
Finally, in such a scenario where everyone will have absolute freedom of undertaking any task necessary to achieve a goal they deem worthy enough, criminal activities will rise. Today, we are tied by law and our moral values. But when the same moral values suggest that we need not adhere to the law but just focus on attaining our goal, that's when the state of society we live and exist in will spiral down drastically. In such a goal-oriented world, where no one has any moral fiber, who decides what actions are justifiable and what are not? Everyone will be so focussed on their own goal that they will forget all their responsibilities towards society. Such a situation cannot be realized in reality else the whole system of justice and accountability will break down.
Hence, it is imperative that we don't give people complete freedom over their actions to achieve their goals as it will have serious ramifications. As explained above, the given notion has many flaws and is totally subjective in nature. In reality, such a goal-oriented world is not sustainable and not universally applicable, so I reject the idea given in the statement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required desired" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'desiring' or 'to be desired'.
Suggestion: desiring; to be desired
... absolute freedom to achieve a required desired result is logically flawed and subjecti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd B, having goals X and Y respectively, where X may be equated to excellence whe...
^^
Line 5, column 491, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... in the view of another person Y, as he didnt even consider the goal worth pursuing. ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 339, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...w but just focus on attaining our goal, thats when the state of society we live and e...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 33, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...wn. Hence, it is imperative that we dont give people complete freedom over their...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2267.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70331950207 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75279932685 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48755186722 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5022714245 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5652173913 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9565217391 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95652173913 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188710632699 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591668007456 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604537121246 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112192396957 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415724096945 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.