If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
The issue that if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable is a contentious one. Any means to achieve include the illegal ways which can be used to achieve goals. While taking legal and ethical means are justifiable, I believe that it is not always justifiable to take any means for attaining a goal because taking illegal means would be unjustifiable, unethical and inefficient.
First, if we take illegal means to achieve a goal, the achievement is not permanent. Because we achieved something which we do not possess, we are not capable of maintaining it with us. For example, if we cheat and win the semi-final chess competition, we would not be able to cheat every match and win the finals because we do not have the skill to win the chess competition. Also, it is unethical to use illegal means for achieving what we want. The life of a person who considers cheating is immoral will be different from someone who considers it unethical which in turn has a significant effect on the society. Hence, taking illegal ways to achieve a goal is unethical and unworthy.
Second, Because of achieving a goal by illegal means, the efficiency would be stemmed. If someone follows unfair means, the rightful owner of the achievement would be deprived of it which would have detrimental effects. For example, if a criminal becomes the president of a country by following unfair means, the nation would not develop because of the illegal ways which would be adopted by the president. Instead, if the rightful and eligible person becomes the president, the nation’s development would be skyrocketed. Therefore, taking illegal means to achieve a goal is unworthy for the effective development of everyone.
On the other hand, taking illegal means can be justifiable in situations of life and death and in unavoidable situations. For example, In a situation where a person is taking a patient to the hospital, it is justifiable to violate traffic rules and regulations because the life a person is always valuable than the formal rules and regulations. One more example would be in situations like war, winning the war by any means would be justifiable because losing the war can have hazardous effects on the people. So, in situations of like these, I think it is justifiable to take any means to achieve the goal because it is worth it.
In conclusion, while taking legal and ethical methods are justifiable, illegal means would be justifiable only in unavoidable situations and situations of life and death. However, in the real world, as there is no perfect rule that can distinguish whether a goal is worthy of taking any means, it is difficult to conclude that if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 71, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable is a contentious one. Any m...
^^^
Line 9, column 383, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 34.0 19.5258426966 174% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2302.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 471.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88747346072 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65859790218 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87639626198 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.382165605096 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5650818253 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.55 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 5.13820224719 292% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276682084481 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117035891486 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168029187671 0.0758088955206 222% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228871659876 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198727136852 0.0667264976115 298% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.