If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
If a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The question of to what limit are means justifiable to reach a specific goal is a complex one. Some believe any path taken to reach a certain goal is completely justified. However, if a goal is worthy, then any means taken to attain it are not justifiable because there are disparate meanings of worthy to different individuals and this practice can lead to corruption.
First, one’s idea of what goal is worthy enough to be justified by any action differ from another. For example, during the era of the holocaust, Hitler and his followers strongly believed performing a genocide of a specific kind of people was for the greater good of society and was not morally unjust. Hitler practiced many unethical acts to Jewish individuals because they were the minority and had an appearance that was unfamiliar to him and others. In his perspective, he was committing such cruel murders of Jewish people to make a more perfect race of humans. So, in other words, he thought the practices he partook in were justified because in his eyes the end goal was worthy enough to kill people to reach. Now, we can see how wrong his idea of worthy truly is and the means he took to attain his main goal were not justified by his unethical acts. This shows everyone’s concept of a worthy goal is different and not every action one takes part in can be justified.
Furthermore, giving people the power to decide what is an acceptable goal could lead to creating corrupt leaders. Take into consideration the president Kim Jong Un of South Korea. Un runs his country on the basis of dictatorship. The citizens of South Korea have no voice in any decision Un makes for their country and are brainwashed into worshipping their leader. Social media, television and the internet are censored and filtered by the government to only subsume content that is approved by their president. The population of South Korea actually does not know accurate information regarding events occurring in the world or even their own leader. President Un is given a plethora of power and he abuses his power to make decisions that are mainly beneficial for him. If an individual like Kim Jong Un decides what goals are worthy enough to forgive any action, then this individual can too abuse this power. Thereby, giving an abundance of power to one can cause the abuse and corruption of power.
Finally, some may argue that there are positive goals that are advantageous to others that can be justified. For instance, if a scientist aims to find a cure for cancer to make the impossible possible and he takes illegal measures to do so, they should be forgiven because he is trying to help the community. Although this may be true, this scientist can also commit unethical acts like injecting an individual with potential antibodies that could save them without the consent of the patient and the injected patient could end up dying. This is only one example where an individual with good intentions for the world can cause damage or harm to others by justifying his actions as worthy.
Though the side believing any means taken to attain a worthy goal should be justified had valid reasons, these claims do not outweigh the opposing view. People have a different perception of what worthy is to them and giving additional powers to decide worthiness of a goal could lead to corruption. Thus, not all actions are justified by a worthy goal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rthy, then any means taken to attain it are justifiable. Write a response in which...
^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...rthy, then any means taken to attain it are not justifiable because there are dispa...
^^^
Line 9, column 893, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to abuse'?
Suggestion: to abuse
...ve any action, then this individual can too abuse this power. Thereby, giving an abundanc...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, thus, as for, for example, for instance, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3171.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 657.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82648401826 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.06280665599 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63629029627 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 297.0 215.323595506 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452054794521 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1004.4 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6622148621 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.344827586 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6551724138 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10344827586 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331333873537 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890360156282 0.0831039109588 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143154850973 0.0758088955206 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201731649136 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184838506088 0.0667264976115 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.