If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more
experience.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should
consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous
and explain how these examples shape your position.
The competition grows healthier as the population and the “itch” to learn more ameliorates. Jobs requires an individual’s educations as the qualifying stage, followed by interview where they face general questions. The expertise in that field come to know –How exactly they would react to practical life based questions asked spontaneously. Now, this creates a spark in one’s mind, where the experienced one would slightly answer much quicker than the sophomore with equal degrees. I would certainly agree with this statement made but not to extreme.
According to the research of HRD at 3M, USA- the experienced scientists creates the output in short time than the younger minds. They have hands onto the existing project, so the pace is remarkable.
With the sudden crisis in industries and economy, the individuals constituting the organisation should react spontaneously to first push the condition intelligibly at a safer stage. Definitely, one who had undergone such an experience would be smart enough to respond to a similar situation much quickly.
Implementing theoretical knowledge into practical one is the sole aim of all workforce. Being quick at it, would definitely be a boon to ace at it. This could even play when the situation is off the field, most probably an interdisciplinary, understanding and controlling lions at dangerous out-break of them at zoo or sanctuaries- doesn’t require qualifications at that instance but practice. Non-academics at school or college similarly work in nurturing to act during adulthood. Internships made necessary at industries for technical students fosters them to understand the current scenario of industries or companies. As the tender brains are smart enough to perceive things and find solution. Experimenting things at earlier age would guide them in their future while taking up the jobs. Indirectly, Jobs should be offered to those with more experience.
But ultimately, its not restricted to it, an avarice develops in one’s mind to get unscrupulous experiences to dump into their resumes. Yes, it is practiced among students- the quality is deteriorating. The student with good qualifications and a proper understanding would reach apex if a chance is given to him, like the short term training- helping to understand both type of nominees. Here, recommendations work inarguably, ensuring the applicant’s honesty and sincerity.
The applicant who has experienced life’s all pathways efficiently not for the sake of resumes should be selected over others.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a similar situation much quickly. Implementing theoretical knowledge into ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, similarly, so, while, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57908163265 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36465472929 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632653061224 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 665.1 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.179424598 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4090909091 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8181818182 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09090909091 5.21951772744 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0963451194198 0.243740707755 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303293923051 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447160439882 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0524194750226 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338121231227 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.