If two applicants for a job are otherwise equally qualified, the job should go to the applicant with more experience. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the specific circumstances in which adopting the position would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The topic raises a controversial issue that two applicants are equally qualified for a job then the job should go to the applicant with more experience. Indisputably, it’s true that experience plays a major role in defining the apt position of the candidate for that job but it is not the only criteria which should be considered while recruiting for an exacting job.
Merely looking at the qualifications of the candidate for a job position covers only the technical aspects of it. For example – academic qualifications, certification on certain courses, proper training etc. However, a company requires much more than that. The most efficient candidate for the position would be the one who along with all the qualifications have the passion and interest for that particular field. Who is promising enough to bring considerable change in that area with their out of the box thinking and profundity. And experience is not an effective scale to measure it.
For example, India’s youngest billionaire, the founder of Oyo started off with zero experience in this completely new concept and the graph of the company’s growth has been higher the ever. He had this idea in mind which he believed that bring a considerable change and is a great business idea. Similarly many startups has been flourishing on the ground of new and impactful ideas which doesn’t really require a stamp of qualification as an assurance for its success
The factors apart from qualification that holds equal importance are efficiency, interest in that particular field, creativity, productivity and most importantly animal spirits. A person with more work experience may not necessarily have all these qualities. In most cases they are routine to certain way of working that they do not make enough space for any improvement and ingenuity. They mainly lack motivation as compared to a fresher who would bring along new ideas that would make significant changes. There’s a reason why HR interviews are conducted for recruitment process.
In conclusion although experience holds a significant position for a certain profile job, it should not be the only criteria to be fulfilled to qualify for a job. The most appropriate candidate would be the one who is overall qualified for the job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 419, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...interest for that particular field. Who is promising enough to bring considerable change in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...le change and is a great business idea. Similarly many startups has been flourishing on t...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, really, similarly, so, then, while, apart from, for example, in conclusion, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 370.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19459459459 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09035588382 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535135135135 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.6894977179 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.058823529 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28253809137 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0927588596188 0.0831039109588 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.096974821694 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175689617689 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114996775178 0.0667264976115 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.