Judging the veracity of popular musician's talent, after generations of his demise, may not be proper decision. The fame of a talented person remains same regardless of time. Accuracy of any talent assessment is acceptable only when we could directly judge that talent.
With emerging times, the world of music has changed a lot. New singers are always welcomed on this stage. The styles of singing, choices of people also have been moved far from the past. Now, experiencing this music world, we may not be the right people to judge the legendary talents.
If a musician is popular, it implies that he is talented. He might not need any explicit testing to prove his real talent. Generations may go on, but the talent of the person will surely be eternal.
Michael Jackson, the famous pop singer. He proved his talent when he is alive. Need for an external person to test his talent is unfounded. This is a very obvious example for opposing the statement.
The author may be correct a few times, but he need not be correct all the times. The history portrays many great musicians who showcased their talents in their respective eras. Their glory was not abated even after many generations. This implies that fame is always remains same. Such fame will never be a hindrance for true judgment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
Judging the veracity of popular musicians talent, after generations of his demise...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 14.8657303371 13% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 58.6224719101 34% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1082.0 2235.4752809 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 224.0 442.535393258 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83035714286 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.55969084622 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44401601585 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602678571429 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 23.0359550562 48% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.3769192118 60.3974514979 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 56.9473684211 118.986275619 48% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.7894736842 23.4991977007 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.15789473684 5.21951772744 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233513821273 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682607545199 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476390488244 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130504475982 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521469228501 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 14.1392134831 51% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.77 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 12.1743820225 53% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.85 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 11.2143820225 57% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.7820224719 51% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.