It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves
Every single man is a part of the society he lives in and can never be completely individual. Each and every one is required to have social security no. , address proof, ID card and community certificates to validate the social group they belong and to show case where they belong. Belonging of an individual to a particular group is an imaginative assertion considering no single person is free from his or her own disbeliefs from the system nevertheless they grow and are completely used to it.
Every human being is unique in his own way. A person brought up or living in a particular social group can reflects its trait as the human brain develops through the experiences it faces throughout. A child born in a family of doctors and growing up in doctors’ community is more likely to envision itself as a doctor and most probably considering its own identity as a doctor. Amidst all the above influence, what is also true is if the child is given the liberty of finding its own identity it may or may not be parallel to the social group it belong which means a human being need not necessarily identify himself in his group as each and every one is distinct in their own way unless externally influenced.
Positing that a person is defined by his social group is dangerous connantation which can lead to various unjust practices. It is in fact arguable that if a child see its mother helping others, obliged to do so in the future. Viewing this situation in a bird’s eye, the probability that it might lead to jaundiced approach is high as it deepens one’s biased attitude. In a school, if a teacher suspects a student for stealing just because he comes from a particular social group, do not seem admirable. A person who is expected to do a degrading job just because his parents does, is far from defining himself from his own group
Moreover, fixing on a stature that a person is what his own kith and kin is makes peculiar people misfit to his own community. In a situation as given in the argument where it is mandatory that everybody should find their identity in their own mingling tendency to their groups can create many outcasts among groups which consequently leads to rise in depression and anxiety among people. There will arise a rush in people to make efforts to belong somehow even though they are not. As a result, they might turn socially unfit.
In this democratic era, it is important for an individual to have at most freedom in choosing how to define himself. At times like this when a lot of unique people who are considered outcast are coming out themselves, still clinging to the traits of a group to make oneself, will never create a healthy environment to live in.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'Each one'.
Suggestion: Each one
...and can never be completely individual. Each and every one is required to have social security no....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...is required to have social security no. , address proof, ID card and community ce...
^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'belongs'?
Suggestion: belongs
... not be parallel to the social group it belong which means a human being need not nece...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: EACH_AND_EVERY[1]
Message: Consider using 'each one'.
Suggestion: each one
...sarily identify himself in his group as each and every one is distinct in their own way unless ext...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 629, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from defining himself from his own group Moreover, fixing on a stature that a per...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esult, they might turn socially unfit. In this democratic era, it is important ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64033264033 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6480702331 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509355509356 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 718.2 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4086478724 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7222222222 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135158602066 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469076041881 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435532771549 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766793800377 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247768932106 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.