the job of the hired outside consultants is to provide this facility to every client. They have better idea over how all other companies, which may include rivals of the client, are implementing ideas for efficiency improvement.
In the issue presented by the author, the author wants to express that the employees of one company can suggest better ways in how to operate company more efficiently than hired outside consultants. Examining this further, following mentioned points are making strong disapproval regarding the claim made by author.
Starting with the approach used by both parties, internal employees are working in the company but their knowledge is limited to the domain where they work. One cannot expect that every employee has holistic knowledge of the company's functioning. Every employee can provide the suggestion up to his/her knowledge about the company. Also they may not be aware of the other company's strategies also. So it would be safe to infer that employee's knowledge about whole company could be myopic. Whereas, the hired outside consultants generally have a good grasp over the whole market, analyzing different strategies adopted by companies in the market and devising strategies which could provide better efficiency. The job of the hired outside consultants is to provide this facility to every client. They have better idea over how all other companies, which may include rivals of the client, are implementing ideas for efficiency improvement.
Moreover, it is true that employees know the ground realities of company, they are working in, but that does not mean that their interpretation about various policies could be considered as right every time. Employees may get biased towards their personal growth while presenting the view, but outside hired consultant do not have any kind of benefit from the policy and strategy changes so they can provide honest opinions without any prejudices.
Similarly, hired outside consultants can be critical in their suggestions for improvement in the efficiency because they are not dependent on the client company for their salaries and promotions. They won't have any problem in providing the negative outcomes of any suggestions or policies which
are currently used by client and harming the client without any hesitations. They can be open and honest in their inferences. On the other hand, employees can give bogus on efficiency of the current scenarios, in order to please their higher ups and authority. Also, employees can present vague suggestions in order to safe themselves, if someone is at blame for any policy which is inefficient.
Considering the scenario where employee are displeased with authority, which makes the employee not to complete their task in the given time an decreasing the overall efficiency of the company. Now the strategies in place are good, employees are good but the authority is not good. If the authority asks for ideas to improve, they may be reluctant to give ideas directly to authority because it may cost employees their employment as they would speak against the management. Whereas, if a third party or hired outside consultants could have come and conducted a confidential survey which has all kinds of questions which they think could be reasons for inefficiency. They could have get better results and actual reasons. This way real problem in the company could have been surfaced.
In conclusion, the hired outside consultants are better to provide strategies for efficiency improvement because they have holistic idea from the market stand-point and their unbiased opionions can really be helpful. which may include rivals of the client, are implementing ideas for efficiency improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...to his/her knowledge about the company. Also they may not be aware of the other comp...
^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... aware of the other companys strategies also. So it would be safe to infer that empl...
^^^^
Line 3, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...also. So it would be safe to infer that employees knowledge about whole company could be ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mes of any suggestions or policies which are currently used by client and harming...
^^^
Line 10, column 142, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...o complete their task in the given time an decreasing the overall efficiency of th...
^^
Line 10, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot good. If the authority asks for ideas to improve, they may be reluctant to giv...
^^
Line 10, column 685, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'got', 'gotten'.
Suggestion: got; gotten
...asons for inefficiency. They could have get better results and actual reasons. This...
^^^
Line 12, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...biased opionions can really be helpful. which may include rivals of the client, are i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, similarly, so, third, whereas, while, as for, in conclusion, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2954.0 2235.4752809 132% => OK
No of words: 553.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3417721519 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84932490483 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78024801863 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446654611212 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 914.4 704.065955056 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0322759175 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.16 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.12 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441546052364 0.243740707755 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147682849657 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180999240755 0.0758088955206 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238532112069 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147762512192 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.