Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places
Every family, society and country is bind with certain codes of conduct with the primal purpose of maintaining harmony and equality. These terms are famously regarded as laws or rules or any confining boundaries which can be defined on it’s own. Laws are made to restrict the recklessness, chaos, entropy to bring about a halcyon situation prevailing throughout. The prime claim of the prompt can be partially agreed with regard to the germane applicability of the statement which can be corroborated with the following given examples.
First of all, flexibility in the law can be a necessity with time and circumstances. For example, child marriage and the so infamous, “Sati Pratha”, where a widowed is compelled to be cremated alive with her dead husband, are the two most lawfully challenged social system. Today, imagining having these laws, soundly prevailed in the society is a matter of disgrace in the face of humanity and human rights. Timely amendments of these laws, staining the belief of having these practiced are a matter of victory for humankind. Laws are abides to prevent the followers to suffer less and those which cause more pain and dishonor are ought to be challenged and changed thoroughly.
Secondly, an innocent can be victimized and be punished accordingly for the time he never convicted just because of his mere wrong placement and timing. For example, a culprit may be responsible for the murder of a victim but another character which is completely unknown and unrelated to the circumstance might be involved causing him to be the main subject of interest while the real mastermind might be having the best time plotting and claiming some other lives. There are many of such examples where an innocent is punished and jailed for decades for something he never did. For such a situation, flexibility on the laws might have saved some quality time for the innocent to spare with himself and his family. Although laws are bind to be the same for all, its relevance and appropriateness in terms of the bearer should be clearly justified.
Lastly, the aforementioned instances might leave a space for laws to be flexible with it however, for some other instances they are ought to be strict and equal for all. For example, traffic rules are set to abide the vehicle runners with some strict principles; having them pass the examination for acquiring license and trial are some globally performed task under traffic conducts. If in such situation, an underage or overage or a pregnant woman or a color blind hit the road, there are major chances of having some unpleasant incidents. This is where rules and laws are to be followed promptly and strictly where they are fined and given some counseling to value laws and its importance. Similarly, flexibility in laws in case of corruption and sycophancy in local and higher government level will be a matter of disaster of running a country. Corruption paralyzes the system and concerning its relevance we can definitely see every country has a corruption investigation committee and its laws bind such corrupts to hold back and be within their limits. Here rigidity on law is crucial for balance and respecting the order itself.
To sum up, laws are made to bring easiness in the life of its followers which in some case might be unjust for someone and a necessity for the other. The vagueness of its flexibility and rigidity can hold multiple facets which can be subtly described with different instances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: IT_IS[9]
Message: Did you mean 'its' (possessive pronoun) instead of 'it's' (=it is)?
Suggestion: its
...ning boundaries which can be defined on it’s own. Laws are made to restrict the reck...
^^^^
Line 2, column 155, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...d the so infamous, “Sati Pratha”, where a widowed is compelled to be cremated alive with ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 570, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s are abides to prevent the followers to suffer less and those which cause more p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, while, for example, first of all, to sum up, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.5258426966 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2910.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 584.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98287671233 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75709392261 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498287671233 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 936.9 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2113729729 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.52173913 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3913043478 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21739130435 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215351356599 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771484511904 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591325174943 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133503459381 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378842404101 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.