The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musicians has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
Music is an art and for every musician it is a way of expressing their emotions, feeling, rage, protest and all sort of human attributes. This process of becoming a musician is a complete dedication towards it and its chores. The claim of the prompt clearly mentions about the linkage of popularity and talent with respect to the musician’s life. While to some extent this can be correlated but for most of the part the reality is other way round which is illustrated in the examples below.
First of all, a musician become popular through the extent of his or her talent and when talent gets appreciated through there comes the wave of fame and popularity. It’s the audience or the admirers of the music who makes any musician famous, give them the epitome of luxury and recognition. But this is brought about only through his or her talent only. If the piece of music he or she presents is not melodious and congruous the audiences are most likely to abhor it and hence they are less likely to follow his art or work. For example, some bands like “Queen” and “The Beatles” have sensational impact on its audience, leading to breaking of previously made records and rising to the apex of fame. Even today they are worshipped in many ways as the pioneer for modern pop music and an inspiration for millions of tyrant music practitioners even after the many members are long dead.
Similarly, the life of Edith Piaf is another example of what talent can bring into the industry but also what remnant effect it holds even after the starter is long gone. She being a French singer, extremely adorned because of her singing style and emotions she plunged into it, not only brought sensation in whole Europe but also in United States. She used to be called into the New York orchestra hall just to give a single performance. Her fame and admiration was all because of her talent and which was highly recognized that time when she was alive and even today, after almost 30 years of her death.
Lastly, there are some talents who rose to fame posthumously only. For example, Miles Davis, a 20th century jazz trumpeter, was recognized through his work only after his death. His famous masterpiece like ‘Kind of Blue’, ‘Miles Ahead’, ‘’Sketches of Spain’, etc. got their triumph posthumously only. They were later recognized and found the identity as much as they deserved when the creator was still alive. This does not appeal about Davis having lesser talent, however, it can be taken in a way that it takes more time for having a diamond made, more pressure to shine and more competition to have them.
To sum up, talent is a key to success, some gets prompt recognition some takes a while but sooner or later the hard toil always pays off. To get recognized either alive or after death is merely the work of time as some works are easily visible while some requires deeper judgment to understand it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...ven after the starter is long gone. She being a French singer, extremely adorned beca...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, similarly, so, still, while, for example, kind of, sort of, first of all, to sum up, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 30.0 14.8657303371 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2415.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.716796875 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46779102097 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5234375 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7821664513 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.772727273 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195312454699 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575055235196 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476369259175 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105149764523 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578877573928 0.0667264976115 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.