The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musicians has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
Real musicians are the ones that are not only lauded in the contemprory time but also after the years of their deaths. The prompt suggests that the real talent of the renown musician can only be assessed after the artist is dead for several generation. Sometimes, given statement holds true, however, in most of the cases, the opposite holds true- the talent of musicians can be analyzed in the same time when they are in existance.
Sometimes, it is true that the capacity of the musicians and their influence in the same field is understimated in the contemporary time. For example, Narayan Gopal was one of the prolific singer of Nepal whose musics are still able to tug the heart of every Nepalese; nevertheless, he was less renown among the populace of Nepal. It was because of the unavailability of the devices required to listen music among the Nepalese people. Later, after the rapid growth of technology, people were able to listen his recorded music; which consequently lead Gopal to the eminence of his career. Finally, after his death, he was cosidered as famous singer and provided with the title "Swor Samrat of Nepal". So, it is sometimes true to assert that the musicians are revered after their demise.
However, with the technological boom, the true talent of the musicians can be recognized in the contemprorary time prior to their death. For instance, Michal Jackson was the one of the greatest singer and dancer that the world have ever witnessed. His moon walk dance is still one of the best moves in the history of the dance. He had produced many songs that hit millions of views in online platform like youtube. Not only he is celebrated in the today's world for his contribution; he was also reverred during his period. The live performance ahead of 1000's people recorded during the period can still be found on the Internet.
Like Jackson, Talor Swift is one of the most praised lady singer of this 21st century; she has received most number of Grammy in the history of the singers. Her dulcet singing is able to make space in every music lover of this world. Therefore, it is not necessary to be dead to be lauded as great musicians in the present world; the audiences and the people can judge them easily.
In sum, most of the musicians' real talent and skill can be assessed as metioned above in the same period of time; with some of the exceptions like Narayan Gopal.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 234, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun generation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several generations'.
Suggestion: several generations
...e assessed after the artist is dead for several generation. Sometimes, given statement holds true,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nternet. Like Jackson, Talor Swift is one of the most praised lady singer of t...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... assessed as metioned above in the same period of time; with some of the exceptions like Naray...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... above in the same period of time; with some of the exceptions like Narayan Gopal.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1998.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75714285714 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53304241079 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.483333333333 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7661063987 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.157894737 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1052631579 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234687553583 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075560990596 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781885076306 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147812257263 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064479794213 0.0667264976115 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.