The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musicians has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment
Musicians are the artists who can tug the heart of the people and can remain in the people's heart for years even after their death. They can provide contemprory life in the form of music that no any artist can do better. The prompt suggests that the real talent of the popular musicians can be analyzed only after their death. In my opinion, I am completely dissonant with the prompt because of the following reasons.
In this contemprorary society, the advancement of the music, instrument and the equipment has played crucial role in revolution of the style of the musicians. There are numerous competent musicians in the present world. The development of the society in the field of internet has uplifted the condition of the music to great extent. Unlike in the past years, we no longer need to buy music DVDs; we can directly listen or watch in online platform like youtube. Moreover, being known to the past and present musics and musicians, we can directly recognize the talented musicians. We no longer need to wait several years to know the talent; the people watching them online can know their value. For instance, Justin Bieber, Selena Gomez, Talyor Swift, BlankPink etc. are the extant popular musicians of the present generation.
Narayan Gopal has been long dead but his musics are still alive in the heart of the Nepali people. He was an eminent musician of the 1970s and also awarded with the title "Swor Samrat" of Nepal. He was not recognized after his death, but in fact, he was a popular musician during his time too. So, popular musicians don't need to be dead for several years to be assessed as being prominent.
Like Narayan Gopal, the female singer Tara Devi was also popular singer of 1970s Nepal; she is known as the "Nightingale of Nepal" for her contribution in music of Nepal. She was able to produce many of her album due to the love and encouragement of the society for her soothin music. In fact, she didn't need to be dead for years, rather she was judged by the contemprorary music lovers.
In conclusion, the ducet voice of singer can be recognized and assessed by the musicians and the general music listening population; they don't need to be dead for several years to be assessed as the eminent one and their fame can be judged in the same contemprorary time by the music lovers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 85, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...art of the people and can remain in the peoples heart for years even after their death....
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...temprory life in the form of music that no any artist can do better. The prompt su...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ing his time too. So, popular musicians dont need to be dead for several years to be...
^^^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ety for her soothin music. In fact, she didnt need to be dead for years, rather she w...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...eneral music listening population; they dont need to be dead for several years to be...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 407.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7714987715 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60117548263 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46683046683 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1225762761 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.35 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276966427162 0.243740707755 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883499986533 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912657821284 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16918523909 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896505705893 0.0667264976115 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.