Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could
The word scandal itself has many facets describing to be a triggering or drawing the attention to the topic neglected till date. What a scandal can do is merely a matter of time which if have veritable evidences might be a norm changing event, perhaps relying completely into this fact can be more challenging as none of the matter is a fact until proven which automatically turn to be a focus oriented “hot” case only. This claim thus made by the prompt can be agreed to some extent, apart there are many other factor adhering to it too which is mentioned below.
First of all, scandals are useful for converging the focus of the public, on the factors which are merely talked about. It leads to understanding the system and the course of conduct underlying it. For example, Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky is not an unknown scandal to all. The ruling president when found guilty with the scandal was impeached through multiple trails making him one of the second presidents of United States to be impeached and the first to be so on a sexual scandal. What lead because of this incident is the questioning on the conduct and credibility of the president. Similarly, the ‘watergate’ scandal is another well famous scandal where the president Mr. Richard Nixon was questioned for misusing his position, finally leading to his resignation in sooner time. This clearly shows, scandals are necessary to bring on the light on topic and showing off the scrutiny and clarity to the people of the prevailing system and activities.
Furthermore, a tiny scandal can ignite a series of investigation. This can be foreseen from the coal scandal in India where the then current Prime Minister Mr. Manmohan Singh himself was supposed to be involved. Drawing out the highlighted names not only charges the case to some height but also concerns the people to know the real incident and verity behind the cases. This incident was later addressed to the Supreme Court, which directed the credible investigation of the scandal. Even though, the case is still on the verge, it definitely waked up the culprits to have their hands off some illegal acts and further power the people to raise voice against it. The development of the investigation committee is a proof depicting some things are ought to be prioritized and assessed on the basis of scandal.
Lastly, with the media being an inciting factor in today’s life, scandal are often regarded as an act of gaining the views for the sake of inclining peoples’ choice and time. The more the viewers, more the likeness and consequently better the feedback. This eloquently polished task can subsequently tarnish the image and status hold by blamed personnel or the company. Recently, query regarding the activities of Monsanto was on the line where, the highly reputed seed producing American company was accused of depleting the native varieties of Wild plants in India and imprudent application of GMOs. The extent of this accusation was denied later but, the impact such incidence hold is magnanimous as peoples’ dependability on this company is questioned leading poor market performance and distrust from them. Instead of putting forth any theories some actual facts and pros are to be understood as they not only question the existence but make it impossible to survive on coming times.
To sum up, scandals are necessary to light some of the topic, give them peoples’ attention and required investigation but the nature and content of the scandal simultaneously control the latter impact of the incident. Some might get reformed while the other just live with the obligate consequence of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...glected till date. What a scandal can do is merely a matter of time which if have...
^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...an do is merely a matter of time which if have veritable evidences might be a nor...
^^
Line 1, column 514, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'factors'?
Suggestion: factors
...some extent, apart there are many other factor adhering to it too which is mentioned b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 745, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ioned for misusing his position, finally leading to his resignation in sooner tim...
^^
Line 4, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...act of gaining the views for the sake of inclining peoples’ choice and time. The ...
^^
Line 4, column 857, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'facts'.
Suggestion: facts
...tead of putting forth any theories some actual facts and pros are to be understood as they n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...sum up, scandals are necessary to light some of the topic, give them peoples’ attention and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...reformed while the other just live with the obligate consequence of it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, if, lastly, regarding, second, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, while, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3044.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99835796388 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72879232917 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 327.0 215.323595506 152% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 956.7 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.4685159594 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.347826087 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4782608696 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30434782609 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 5.13820224719 272% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113664598173 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360059865813 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031926166888 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0682017297583 0.150359130593 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336908792169 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 166.0 100.480337079 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.