No act is done purely for the benefit of others.
Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.
In the present world, the traits of kindness, empathy and devotion for well being of others are something taken as faked or an act of publicity. However, these are something people develop in their process of life which can be interpreted in any ways possible. The claim made by the author about self interest needs some concrete reasoning therefore I disagree with the given statement for the following reasons.
First of all, the idea that no act is done purely for the benefit of others cannot be stated as such because there are many of such people who have devoted their life for the sake of the other. For example Mother Teresa; who changed the perception of giving and compassion in the whole world. She could have lived as lavish life as she had wanted instead she advocated for those underprivileged children and people who needed love and care. She not only paved the way for giving but also inspired millions of others to follow the legacy and appreciate the pleasure of giving. No one can come closure to this act of kindness and devotion for humanity.
Secondly, the human right activist, Martin Luther King; who died for the sake of other, just for getting the right and equality they deserved. If he had thought just for his sake and his self interest, the voice of African-American would never have been heard and considered at the time of need. He gave his dream to the millions of American and helped them build their own, where people of all races and religion can live in harmony and mutual respect. Nevertheless, he lost his life to hatred and apathy, to radical thought and inequality. Therefore, some act are done just for the sake of others and for those yet to come so that the world we dream to live, we expect to have can be achieved and can be made.
Finally, some acts though seemed beneficial can have a deep connection with the self interest as well. In today’s time where everything is done for the sake of money and some media attention prevalence of such a scenario is not something surprising. For example, there are hundreds of organizations and foundation who for the name of supporting and creating a better life for orphan children or aged people have used the fund for their own self interest. For an underdeveloped countries occurrence of such an act has become a norm. This kind of act is one of the reasons for people doubting the validity and motive of contributing personal.
To sum up, some act are selflessly done for people and some are done for a motive to gain own interest. It’s up to peoples’ dignity and dedication where they are inclined towards for the sake of others or for own self.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
...st, the voice of African-American would never have been heard and considered at the time of nee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 620, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the sake of others and for those yet to come so that the world we dream to live,...
^^
Line 4, column 477, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...wn self interest. For an underdeveloped countries occurrence of such an act has become a ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, kind of, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2183.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 469.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65458422175 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52784961697 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498933901919 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3076124936 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.15 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.45 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.46461340658 0.243740707755 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14714749505 0.0831039109588 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0971580621156 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289993462633 0.150359130593 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584047400938 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.