Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
Science and research from the time immemorial has been prime field serving for the sake of human kind. These have with due course of time proven to be a boon and ban for the sake of people. The prompt thus mentioned advocates that the scientists and researches for having predilection towards betterment of mankind and I strongly agree with this statement and corroborate my claim with following reasons.
First of all, science is a field of diversity where tangible and intangible, visible and not visible and molecular level analysis is done which is equally painstaking and daunting in many ways. But scientists instead of many such challenges devote themselves in the field of uncertainty and fact. Such dedication since the time unknown has been proven to be boon as the modern advances in technology from burning stoves in the kitchen to transportation; linking the global world and medical advances; saving lives and giving another has been possible. These have benefitted people around the world not just for communicating the others but also simply sophisticating life. If such advances had not been done, the face of the world would have been quite different.
Secondly, advances on medical science can be another field where myriad of people can be benefitted at once. For example, AIDS and Cancer; diseases which are deadly and cureless claim thousands of life each year. Even though there cause and effect have been discovered during collectively earlier period of time, there cure is yet to be on its way. People lose their life to these deathly evil but a cure for halting them is yet to be worked on. Therefore, medical researches should be inclined towards serving the people and eradicating such a scenario.
Lastly, scientists and science have advanced themselves in the field of nuclear science, which from no ways have some benefitting protocol at the time of need. Powerful and economically viable countries are obsessed with having nuclear weapon as it is something which shows the extent of power and potential a country hold. The nuclear casualty of Nagasaki and Hiroshima is something people have yet to forget and marked as the worst happening in the history but the advancement of nuclear science and chemical science is surging than anything else. This is something which will never serve the people as the powers fight for power and fame; the commoners are the one losing their life for them. Therefore, scientists must devote their knowledge for uplifting the life and alleviating the suffering of the people.
To sum up, science is the basis of life which nurtures it but can also curse it. Therefore, scientist should always focus on serving the people rather than discovering methods to end them. This can only be way for creating a save and sound world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... discovered during collectively earlier period of time, there cure is yet to be on its way. Pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds to end them. This can only be way for creating a save and sound world.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 33.0 14.8657303371 222% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02370689655 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61420104035 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7029944953 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0952380952 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148580958778 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.049259223404 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054615608285 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0866716692187 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022070205698 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.