Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.
The statement states that the greater number of people would benefit when scientists and researchers would orient their research on the areas which affects greater number of populations. The benefit of the population depends on various factors and just shifting the area of research towards it would not be sufficient. I do not agree with the statement and a few key factors to validate my point are:
If scientists and researcher only focus on the areas that affect the greater number of people then, discoveries and advancement in certain area would not have happen. For instance, in the subject of studying the outer space where the outcomes have no direct relation to the mass population, then many of the external planet would not have been found. By studying the outer-space, we are able to placed satellites which helps us in understanding the weather. Studying the weather helps us to provide early warning about some natural calamity. This helps in saving number of lives and property. So, if the early scientists and researchers had not done the research about the outer space then it would have been difficult to send satellites.
Furthermore, if the scientists and researchers do not study different diseases and viruses and experimenting with them, then it would be disadvantages. Though studying the unknown disease and virus do not affect or have direct advantages to greater number of people but doing so would be very beneficial for the future. If some unknown virus or disease spreads across the world then the scientists might have the basic knowledge of the virus and prepare an antidote faster. If the research was not done then, to find an antidote would take much time and this could even cause number of deaths. We have experience this situation, in the year 2020 by Covid-19. As the scientists didn't have the knowledge about the virus to prepare an antidote it took more than a year and during that time many lifes where lost and economy suffered. So, by just focusing on the research which have immediate benefit would not be a prudent choice.
Not denying the fact, that research should not be done in areas which benefit greater number of people. Researching in area which benefit larger amount of people have numerous advantages. First, the research in technology helps to make life of people easier and comfortable. For instance, the self driving cars, taxis and ordering food, and groceries at home on a click of a button has make life of people easier and hassle free. Secondly, the research done in robotics and automation helps to increase the production and overall quality of the product, whose benefits affect the people in general.
In conclusion, just by directing the research towards area which affect greater mass would not be beneficial. Researching in other areas should be done as we never know when that might come in help.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 160, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'happened'.
Suggestion: happened
...ancement in certain area would not have happen. For instance, in the subject of studyi...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 678, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ear 2020 by Covid-19. As the scientists didnt have the knowledge about the virus to p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2394.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 482.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96680497925 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68556276237 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61205214564 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439834024896 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 731.7 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8356763431 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365337680556 0.243740707755 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126409496841 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105496206056 0.0758088955206 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238326970431 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692248977588 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.