Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

The prompts claims that the scientists and other researcher should pay more attention to exploring the fields which are more likely to benefit the human race. I mostly agree with the position for two main reasons, which I will elucidate below. However, I do believe the purpose of science is to understand the unknown and sometimes the pursue to understand these unknown factors can led to significant discoveries.

To begin, in the last few decades scientific studies are in front row, leading the development of the human societies. Hence, it is beneficial for humans if scientist and researchers based their studies in the fields which can potentially prosper our societies. For eg. the energy crisis which we were supposed to face today due to the shortage of fuel supply was severely mitigated with the development of nuclear power. Devices to harness the solar and wind energy also majorly help to overcome these problems today. Thus, we understand the requirement of further studies in this sector. In addition to this, the rich studies in the medical field had help significantly to fight against the major pandemics of the centuries like the covid-19, polio and swine flu. These factors provides us with ample of evidence of how important the research in such fields were for the human societies.

Secondly, the purpose of exploring fields which do not benefit the society is debatable and questionable. Scientist and researchers are generally consider to be among the few most highly intellectual individuals. It is very difficult to imagine a world without the internet. What if the people who invented and advanced the various component of the internet dedicated their work on something else? What is Benjamin Franklin was invested in the field of geology. What if Edison gave up on the light bulb experiment after failing for the hundredth time. All the above factors bolster the claim that researcher should work in the fields which have the potential to alleviate the society at large.

Lastly, I do concede that many a times the studies of unknown scientific principals can led to fortuitous discoveries. The potential benefits of such discoveries outweighs the possible failure in these studies. Many useful inventions and discoveries were infact a result of the ventures in the unknown. The inventions which do not seem to benefit the society today, might possibly change the world tomorrow. Such is experiment of inhabiting the Mars. Though highly debatable topic today, it do have the potential to send human race not just to the lonely red planet but can even further accelerate the possibility to go far and beyond what we think is impossible today. Thus, it is fair to conclude that it somewhat acceptable for scientist to keep the motive to benefit society aside and work in a field which do not have known benefit.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'claim'.
Suggestion: claim
The prompts claims that the scientists and other researche...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...to understand the unknown and sometimes the pursue to understand these unknown factors can...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'helped'.
Suggestion: helped
...e rich studies in the medical field had help significantly to fight against the majo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 781, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
...-19, polio and swine flu. These factors provides us with ample of evidence of how import...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...Scientist and researchers are generally consider to be among the few most highly intelle...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n was invested in the field of geology. What if Edison gave up on the light bulb exp...
^^^^
Line 7, column 32, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...arge. Lastly, I do concede that many a times the studies of unknown scientific princ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
... not seem to benefit the society today, might possibly change the world tomorrow. Such is expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
... not seem to benefit the society today, might possibly change the world tomorrow. Such is expe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 492, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...Though highly debatable topic today, it do have the potential to send human race n...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06595744681 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72200845215 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508510638298 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.84767824 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2083333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17766827094 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481189898124 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589852886547 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120968958521 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425997047123 0.0667264976115 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, thus, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this: