Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In present context, laws and rights are also regarded equivalent to basic need. The prompt discusses that the rules governing a country and its citizen must be nimble in order to accommodate various cases. However, I strongly disagree with the prompt and provide two reasons for supporting why the law must be rigid.
Firstly, judicial system is the most important and strongest body of a country. It is disinterested to any case, culture, economic status and color of people. Judiciary binds all people including president, doctors, businessmen as well as common people and treats all of them equally. Judicial system also governs and monitors the activity of executive and legislative system. Such an important part of the nation must never be flexible. Its decision must be irrevocable and must not have influence from any other factors. For instance, we recently heard about giving a death penalty to Congressman of China for sleeping in parliament. It may be common and minor mistake for most of the people around the world but for them it was an insult to the parliament and pleaded the person guilty with major punishment. This not only inspires fear for other Congressmen in wrongdoing but also increases the reverence to the parliament. This example is a strong evidence of the strong laws and policies and is certainly required for greater good.
Moreover, we see dictatorial countries mostly develops in terms of infrastructure and sophistication. This is all due to lack of inflexibility of the policy. For example, even though Hitler killed many Jews people and tempted to cause world war but it cannot be denied that he developed Germany to a greater extent that would have not been possible without his stringent principles. We can also take examples of present communist countries like Russia, China where they value freedom and right to an extent. If any citizen crosses the marked line of freedom, they are severely punished. This has led to great success in both the countries because it decreases unwanted interference in development activities, in name of right and law. Undesirable protest, stipulation is discouraged and a strong border holds all people together.
In conclusion, laws are like the father of a family; they certainly have a good concern for their members but must act martinet so that children who are a symbol of citizen of country be within the moral principles and have a decorous propriety.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inciples and have a decorous propriety.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08229426434 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80871523798 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576059850374 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7512450717 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0476190476 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124623768188 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334118681705 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341275017482 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802870434595 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326853002913 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.