Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teaching is a one of the responsible as well as a respected occupation which not only depends on the knowledge of the teacher but also his qualities to express and make the taught material lucid to their students. The prompt discuses that the stipend of the teacher be determined by his ability to teach which can be measured by evaluating the grades of the students. I strongly disagree with the prompt annd provide two reasons to explain why such tenets are not fruitful.
First of all, the performance of a student does not only depend on the quaity of his teacher. The characterisitcs of a student also depend on his home environment. A student under a agile supervisor can have a better quality but for this acquisition to maintain he must have a commensurate proper external surrounding. For example, a student who plays basketball well and under a expert coach if not given to play by his parents and force him to study only, then the student can never be a good basketball player. Here determining the salary of the coach by the performance of his fellow players is not credible.
Secondly, when the salary of a teacher is based on his student merit, there is chance that erudite instructors may not show alacrity to teach seemly poor students. It not only proscribe teacher to devote to students who are comparatively weaker but also provide students with poor performance with less consummate lecturers based on his low allowances.
However, some people argue that there is no point in providing a teacher with good wage unless he is able to improve his students quality. These rule can encourage those teacher who focus their format on test rather than skill and knowledge oriened activities. Moreover, teachers who teach only a modicum of curriculum for a major study period and give questions having majority of the questions of the small part of book can increase the outward grade of the students but is vanity in terms of their learning. Despite these the teacher will be touted for his seemly good didactism.
Thus, in conlcusion, student academic perfomance is not an immaculate standard of measurement of his or her level of knowledge and determining the teacher salary in the basis of the marks achieved by the students in exam is absolutely absurd.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n his home environment. A student under a agile supervisor can have a better qual...
^
Line 2, column 378, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ent who plays basketball well and under a expert coach if not given to play by hi...
^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this teacher' or 'those teachers'?
Suggestion: this teacher; those teachers
...dents quality. These rule can encourage those teacher who focus their format on test rather t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1888.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86597938144 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76394905714 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3163287945 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.866666667 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.21951772744 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197657450116 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742649383455 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364556193645 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12000515043 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316091578936 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.