Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The statement linking laws flexibility to various circumstances, times, and places throughs light on the recent human advancements and scenarios panning out. Human race developed advanced cognitive skills for survival compared to other species. However, humans are governed and have to abide by the laws devised by the column.
The statement attempts to bridge the idea of how laws have transformed over time. During medival period where kings were ruling kingdom’s, laws were laid in favour of punishing spy’s, thief’s mostly, where evidence is not very specific, human’s words and concise are the only factors considered to resolve the scenario. There were no complex judgements required which are to be reconsidered or speculated to understand heinous motive behind crime. Advancements in technology has given rise to new and complex scenarios where laws are to be made to restrict people to do activities which will effect world peace. Be it terrorists, be it drug cartels, different laws are to be considered to control the corresponding crimes.
Evenmore, advent of technology has changed the way we have to look at laws devised. Evidence plays key support now. CC TV footage, DNA testing, truth test are few tools which can help us explain the motive behind the crime, how plan was devised and executed accordingly existing laws are reworked to provide justice. Consider the example of Juvenile act by 14 year old, selling drugs who commited the crime because of the need for money to support his family and his studies, second scenario where 14 year old in his discretion and desperation to earn more money to have lavish and luxurious life, Both scenarios are to be evaluated and actioned accordingly. Same law won’t suffice for both situations.
In contrast to the statement, Facts are to be taken into account while evaluating. Laws are made after lot of deliberations from judiciary considering all possible situations from past experiences. Therefore, considering changes now and then can give huge scope to tamper the laws and create loopholes for criminals to evade from law, worsening the situation furthermore.
Laws are devised to restrict dubious actions from small segment of radicals, Evaluating the scenario with evidence and devising new changes if necessary is required for transparent judgement and goverenance.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-09-08 | narendranath | 16 | view |
- Claim The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models Reason Heroes and role models reveal a society s highest ideals 75
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 75
- The diagram shows the making of icecream processing 1
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 16
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'considered resolving'.
Suggestion: considered resolving
... words and concise are the only factors considered to resolve the scenario. There were no complex jud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...rict people to do activities which will effect world peace. Be it terrorists, be it dr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...onsidering all possible situations from past experiences. Therefore, considering changes now and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, then, therefore, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34139784946 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83785804063 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620967741935 0.4932671777 126% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.8468571014 60.3974514979 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.882352941 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8823529412 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189884478664 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633535318682 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517326592195 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969998959449 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450739786164 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.