The statement rises a problem about the flexiblity of the Law, which is also the concentration of law experts and the ordinary public. From my perspective, I believe that law should be flexible enough while the flexibility makes no harm to the law's authority.
It make sense to urge the flexibility of the law, and the reason lies on the fact that the law cannot cover all the situation in the real world. For example, if some one on the street is dying for a heart attack and a kind driver pick him up and break the traffic rule in order to get him to the hospital in the shortest time. In this case, most people would hold the argument that driver be not punished for breaking the traffic rule, since lifes are far important to those rules. Another example is the behavior of grey zone in the real world, which do not break the current law yet produce negative effect on the society and individual. The rape on male, for instance, cannot be accused for any crime in China, whereas this conduct would cause huge damage to the victims' mental health. In this way, the laws are also supposed to be flexible in order to punish those vice and bring justice to the victim.
Nevertheless, the unstable laws can also cause series of questions. According to the social contract theory, the government is obligated to maintain the stability of the society. The frequent change of the law, however, brings the chaos and the unrest of the whole society. Additionally, the changeble laws would enable villians to make use of the laws for their own profits. Therefore, any item of the laws should be formulated and implemented after deep consideration and discussion of the experts and representatives from vairous aspects of the society to make it suitable for the society. This, at the same time, means the boring and trival procedure of any change of formulation of the law, which justifies the necessary of the laws stability and ensure laws' practicablity and authority.
Finally, those properties of laws do not have to conflict. For those rules and crime which is of low effect on on the society and individual, we could take the real situation in to account and make a flexible judgement. we should be cautious, however, to any modulation of laws which could have great impact on the whole society.
To wrap it up, at the first glance, it could be hard to choose my position, especially when complicated situations in the real world are taken into considerable. However, after deep contemptation, I claim that the law should be adjustable for those minor behaviors yet remain authority to those disciplines causing great influence to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
...le the flexibility makes no harm to the laws authority. It make sense to urge...
^^^^
Line 5, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...o harm to the laws authority. It make sense to urge the flexibility of the la...
^^^^
Line 5, column 162, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...tion in the real world. For example, if some one on the street is dying for a heart atta...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 735, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'laws'' or 'law's'?
Suggestion: laws'; law's
...w, which justifies the necessary of the laws stability and ensure laws practicablity...
^^^^
Line 13, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: on
... rules and crime which is of low effect on on the society and individual, we could ta...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 221, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... account and make a flexible judgement. we should be cautious, however, to any mod...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2213.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83187772926 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67696720029 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.396133747 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.473684211 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1052631579 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26315789474 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207501375434 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745292423608 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577697165512 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139718526926 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587875664732 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.