In this fast-paced world, the high educational institutions are faced with increasing problems more than ever. Among those problems, there is one that most students and institutions would pay attention with: Should the educational institution shoulder the obligation to set the requirement by which institutions could refuse those students not good enough? To some extent, it does make sense since it could indirectly enable unqualified students to find the appropriate field. However, it should be constrained within a reasonable range.
The educational institutions, such as universities, definitely should have the responsibility to guide the students' direction to a certain degree, which is the social responsibility of educators. In fact, universities in the USA do make attempt to guild their students by the course structure. In the first two years of USA university, for the required courses, most students are only allowed to select common foundational courses in different major. At the same time, students have a great number of elective courses in different fields and majors, helping them find the majors they are really interested in and major transfers are common and convenient. By this course structure, students could find their desired major and universities fulfill their social responsibility as guide the students.
Nevertheless, the definition of success is hard to judge, making leaving the decision to students the best choice. The baseline for success is sometimes ambitious and the key factor to success is hard to value. For instance, the interest and passion for the particular field could be the most contributing factor. According to a survey conducted in China by the HZNU, among those top students in the different major, 50% of them claim that the interest is the key supporting factor. Additionally, following panel study reveal that students motivated by interests have comparatively higher average salary and position compared to other students, indicating the interest is an important boosting factor in their career. In this sense, it should be left to the student to make the decision of the suitable field.
Still, the appropriate guidance from an educational institution is essential to students. There are several situations could lead the student to the wrong field and waste their time and tuition. The impression from the outsider to a particular major, for instance, could be misleading. In China, Millions of students enter the medicine major with the dream of being a lifesaver. However, a considerable number of those students transferred to other majors in 2 years due to heavy academic pressure and bad working environment. In order to prevent such things, the educational institution truly should shoulder the responsibility to let students know the situation of a major prior to their admission.
To sum up, the educational institution should be in charge of the commitment to preclude students from choosing the improper major by introducing all the potentially appropriate fields to students and left the decision to students themselves. In this way, students could choose the right major and have a better career.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 108, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ld have the responsibility to guide the students direction to a certain degree, which is...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: A_GREAT_NUMBER_OF_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'electives'?
Suggestion: electives
...e time, students have a great number of elective courses in different fields and majors,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, for instance, in fact, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 495.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43838383838 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71684168287 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04066645399 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 826.2 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4725178277 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.043478261 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5217391304 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284120108711 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849799445544 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630914452932 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175942895863 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399411954391 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.