There is no shortage of opinions regarding how specific should be the laws to cover all circunstances, times and places and still continue applicable. While the flexible and restricted laws have many strengths and weaknesses, I strongly believe that laws should be as flexible as possible, otherwise they would not stand so long. Furthermore, flexible laws make less space for uncevered situations, thus rasing legal stability of a country.
First of all, anyone can recognize how long and hard is the process to approve laws by the parliment. Representing differing and most of times antagonist groups of the society, the congress always has a lot of political discussion before approving any new or revised legislation. Indeed, the process to fix or update a law in most countries is the same of that needed to approve a new one. Based on that, flexible laws created without focus on very restricted circunstances or places should be preferable to guarantee that they can be in force for a long-time. For example, some private markets are totally exposed to technology evolutions that quickly transform the business enviroment. Such markets should be ruled by laws that keep updated even if a disruptive new technology transform the way the companies interact and negociate.
Secondly, a great level of estability should be assumed for any country's legal framework in order to attract long run investments. In this regard, I set of flexible laws that do not need revision every other year should contribute to make the country competitive in the globalized world. For example, multinational companies use to analyse the labor legal framework of several countries in orther to decide where to build new industries. So, flexible laws capturing differing ways of production and interaction between the workers and the companies should benefit any country to receive such industries.
On the other hand, one may argue that flexible and vague laws could be impractible to be applied and well interprated, hindring their efficacy. Nevertheless, such claim is flawed, mainly because specific conditions in the application of any law could be covered by infra-legal regulation. Indeed, regulations are uselly easer to be created and updated, making them a much better instrument to specify concrete situations and application conditions than the laws.
To sum up, flexible laws are more likely to be in force and updated for a long time, what give countries stability and helps in attracting long-run captal investment. For these reasons I definitely belieave that laws should be as flexible as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the times') or simply say ''most times''.
Suggestion: most of the times; most times
...e parliment. Representing differing and most of times antagonist groups of the society, the c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same of that needed to approve a new one. Based on that, flexible laws create...
^^
Line 3, column 550, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...guarantee that they can be in force for a long-time. For example, some private markets are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...d. For example, multinational companies use to analyse the labor legal framework of...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2197.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 416.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28125 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95211784468 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550480769231 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0463707887 60.3974514979 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 122.055555556 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159084400275 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604562969461 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412099229793 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10425221161 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273042552927 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.