Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.
The author claims that laws need to be plastic, instead of fixed. In general, I agree with this notion; however, the law still need to preserve their objectivity and validity, to some extent, and thus cannot be modified arbitrary.
To begin with, it is necessary to maintain the flexibility of laws for two reasons. First, different generation has their unique and contemporary culture and ethos, therefore, a long-lasting law should be adaptable to these changes. For example, in the previous generation, marriage with kinship is the taboo. From the genetic perspective, it may causes the high probability of troublesome infants, hence, the the law was legislated to prohibit marriage between family members. However, in the modern society, it actually contradicts to the liberation of human beings. Furthermore, thanks to the development of the genetic technology, today we possess the ability to prevent the infancy problem resulted from marriage with kinships. The alternative choices are from adoption of babies to genetic engineering. Thus, the law that prohibits certain kinds of marriage is not suitable today and need to be modified.
Second, a new law is usually not well-established, so the modification is needed. Just as a scientific theories, the new-legislated law may not be sound in the beginning; it may exist many foibles and vulnerabilities. Through the process of corrections and reinforcements, it will be more apposite to citizens. Take the policy of protecting the intellectual right as an example. In the beginning, it just protect the intellectual right from copying the music or movie from substantial media, such as disks and video tapes. Nevertheless, with the emergence of the Internet, the piracy become intangible through the cyber net and more and more people utilize this way to skirt the law. In this sense, the law for protecting the intellectual right need to be improve to tackle with this problem.
On the other hand, law should be rigor to maintain their disinterestedness and integrity. After all, people need the constant and equal law to follow. If a law can be changed easily by some people for some ulterior purpose; or if a law is enacted in cursory way and then be changed soon, it will lose the trust from the public. Once people distrust the law, the validity of them will be vitiated.
To sum up, by virtue of the changeability of the society and the potential vulnerability of the law, it is necessary to keep law’s flexibility. However, at the same time, we still need to balance the validity of the law that should not let it becomes fluky.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...bability of troublesome infants, hence, the the law was legislated to prohibit marriage...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...bability of troublesome infants, hence, the the law was legislated to prohibit marriage...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 104, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'theory'?
Suggestion: theory
...ication is needed. Just as a scientific theories, the new-legislated law may not be soun...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w that should not let it becomes fluky.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, thus, well, after all, for example, in general, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2179.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07925407925 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04329472548 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519813519814 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 683.1 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 4.38483146067 365% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1614815848 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7391304348 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91304347826 5.21951772744 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247408068531 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748289264865 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612314035285 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148143938201 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371520026057 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 100.480337079 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.